Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Violet_Crumble

(36,174 posts)
4. It's a really good article. This following bit stood out for me...
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 11:50 PM
Feb 2012

Audre Lorde suggests that it is our responsibility as feminists to come to see these connections. Only in this way can we come to understand that the true liberation of one oppressed group cannot happen without the liberation of all oppressed people.
Here is how Audre Lorde puts it:

I am a
lesbian woman of Color whose children eat regularly because I work in
a university. If their full belies make me fail to recognize my
commonality with a woman of Color whose children do not eat because
she cannot find work, or who has no children because her insides are
rotted from home abortions and sterilization; if I fail to recognize
the lesbian who chooses not to have children, the woman who remains
closeted because her homophobic community is her only life support,
the woman who chooses silence instead of another death, the woman who
is terrified lest my anger trigger the explosion of hers; if I fail
to recognize them as other faces of myself, then I am contributing not
only to each of their oppressions but also to my own, and the anger
which stands between us then must be used for clarity and mutual empowerment,
not for evasion by guilt or further separation. I am not free
while any woman is unfree, even when her shackles are very different
from my own. And I am not free as long as one person of Color
remains chained. Nor is any one of you (Audre Lorde, [1980] 1984.
Pp132-133).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm glad you reposted this...I think it is a good article to make all of us reflect maddezmom Feb 2012 #1
And how for some of us, our identity is tied up with other things. n/t justiceischeap Feb 2012 #2
of course. maddezmom Feb 2012 #3
No kidding. That post was gibberish. Not much help to girls and gals. nt DCKit Feb 2012 #17
Of course it is, and that is natural. boston bean Feb 2012 #29
It's a really good article. This following bit stood out for me... Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #4
+1. n/t TriMera Feb 2012 #5
```````` Vanje Feb 2012 #8
That whole article lays things out so well. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #6
I know. I really got it when I read it... Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #7
isn't it interesting though iverglas Feb 2012 #19
egypt today. the womens fight to "free" the man..... nt seabeyond Feb 2012 #21
My goodness, such powerful lines: justiceischeap Feb 2012 #9
A million years ago in college we got to read Audre Lorde Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #10
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #11
This is the Feminists group. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author mistertrickster Feb 2012 #13
Better move along then. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #14
thank you starry. nt seabeyond Feb 2012 #15
Maybe this isn't the place for you. n/t laconicsax Feb 2012 #16
I don't know, but I learn more here by reading MineralMan Feb 2012 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author mistertrickster Feb 2012 #22
Maybe that should tell you something about whether things have changed in that time. n/t laconicsax Feb 2012 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author mistertrickster Feb 2012 #24
In that case, as I've stated, this may not be the place for you. laconicsax Feb 2012 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author mistertrickster Feb 2012 #26
You're welcome to post here, provided you observe the SOP. laconicsax Feb 2012 #27
this poster has no intention to observe the SOP and has basically told us so. boston bean Feb 2012 #28
It's just a name. mistertrickster Feb 2012 #30
I get it's just a name boston bean Feb 2012 #31
because we are told we talk too much about gender.... anyway. seabeyond Feb 2012 #32
what stopped you? boston bean Feb 2012 #33
do you think the poster should have been blocked, seeing how you are a regular seabeyond Feb 2012 #34
yes, i do think he should have been blocked. boston bean Feb 2012 #35
that would be what the wimpy little SOP that we have says, you are right. nt seabeyond Feb 2012 #36
seemed like a no brainer to me. nt boston bean Feb 2012 #37
I was hoping for the result we got. laconicsax Feb 2012 #38
he left cause a regular feminist member was appalled we hadnt kicked him out yet and she said it out seabeyond Feb 2012 #39
The stuff about confusion about how parts of one's identity relate to each other... redqueen Feb 2012 #18
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»This message was self-del...»Reply #4