Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Feminists
In reply to the discussion: I'm a little peeved, to put it lightly [View all]ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)57. "I invite you to PM me when you're doing the Goddess's work in some thread on DU, will you?"
I probably will, unless I forget.
as a lurker I watched the Feminist "group" have to deal with an untold number of men wander through to tell the women here how to run things, what to think, how to be, what to do and what not do, how to behave in general.
I understand having non-feminist men coming around to boss everyone around can be incredibly annoying.
When an "in group" (men in this case) is challenged, they usually become upset. "In groups" are not used to being challenged, so they may take any criticism as bigotry or silliness. This is why I think some non-feminist men sometimes patrol the Feminist group.
But from your response here, it's apparent that clearly, you feel entitled to be here -- ahh, that wonderful, all-pervasive sense of male entitlement.
I do feel I have the right to go where I am welcomed.
Whatever else happens, men can always fall back on that, always rely on that, can't they?
I don't know.
And of course, technically, if you fit the Group's mission and behave yourself and all that, you are entirely entitled to be here.
I agree.
It just seems to me that a sensitive pro-feminist male would be cognizant of such things and tread lightly, if at all. And perhaps reassure someone who raised the issue instead of bristle defensively.
I did not feel as if any issue was raised in your original post to me. I felt like I was being told to go away.
And yes, you're free to be here and I'm perfectly free to find the clear sense of entitlement demonstrated offensive.
I agree. I will never tell anyone here what should or should not offend them.
Perhaps you can dissuade me of this unflattering picture of you?
My only jury-hidden post on DU3: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=155718
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How do you discuss it? For starters, don't refer to people who disagree with you...
TheWraith
Feb 2012
#1
"not quite so tired" me, too.... cause it matters an it is a good subject. nt
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#10
what is interesting is it is the second gay woman kicked off du, thru our forum, not by us..
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#21
EDITED - so how many here agree with this characterization of this thread and this group?
iverglas
Feb 2012
#29
I've got a suggestion, and it's aimed at everyone, including our vindictive alerter...
Violet_Crumble
Feb 2012
#40
IMHO, there's not one vindictive alerter, there are many alerters acting in good faith.
Gormy Cuss
Feb 2012
#46
My starting assumptions could be naive, but I lean toward the vocal minority "theory."
ZombieHorde
Feb 2012
#37
Except perhaps for a few trolls, the FR folks self identify as anti-Democrat.
ZombieHorde
Feb 2012
#39
"I invite you to PM me when you're doing the Goddess's work in some thread on DU, will you?"
ZombieHorde
Feb 2012
#57