Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Squinch

(53,866 posts)
1. I appreciate her saying this, but to me it is so self-evident that, deep down, I'm just pissed that
Sat Jan 26, 2019, 08:33 AM
Jan 2019

it needs to be said.

I took no end of grief for saying that if the Democratic primary comes down to a man and a woman, I will vote for the woman.

There was a lot of self-righteous "I vote based on policies!" or "I can only say that I would vote for a woman with all else being equal!"

Well, all else is NEVER going to be exactly equal. But, within the Democratic primary options, neither is "all else" going to be so glaringly different that it will overcome my demand to be represented for the first time in 250 years. And I vote based on policies too. But I see no advantage of, say, Joe over Kamala or Liz in terms of policy.

We've waited 250 years. It's time. Surely that is too obvious to need explaining.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»Not a Man 2020: There's n...»Reply #1