Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Feminists

Showing Original Post only (View all)

no_hypocrisy

(49,920 posts)
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 08:18 AM Apr 2017

In 1900, what did it mean if you were engaged for 3 years and your fiance jilted you? [View all]

I just discovered my grandfather registered to marry a woman, then registered again 4 years later to marry my grandmother in 1904. The first woman and her family sued for breach of promise to marry. All this was archived in newspapers.

Please confirm if I'm guessing correctly: Wouldn't the first woman's prospects for marriage be ruined because of the social humiliation, the fact that she was off the marriage market for four years, she would be a financial burden on her family as she was now deemed an old maid, etc.? Besides the money, what were the goals of suing for breach of promise?

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Part of the goal would be to vindicate the woman Maeve Apr 2017 #1
One reason for engagement rings Freddie Apr 2017 #2
didn't work out that way for me. unblock Apr 2017 #3
Where did this happen? PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2017 #4
Altoona, PA no_hypocrisy Apr 2017 #6
When I got married in 1980 in the state of Michigan, PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2017 #7
That's what I figured too. no_hypocrisy Apr 2017 #8
Here's some background TheOther95Percent Apr 2017 #5
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»In 1900, what did it mean...»Reply #0