Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LGBT

onenote

(44,914 posts)

9. The plaintiff can talk about conversion therapy all he wants

Reply to RKP5637 (Original post)

Mon Dec 18, 2023, 03:06 AM

Dec 2023

He just can’t practice it. Just as he can talk about electroshock therapy or using leeches to cure patients or any other discredited medical procedures and treatments the practice of which is prohibited.

Not seeing a first amendment issue.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clarence Thomas is outraged that the Supreme Court refused to take up conversion therapy case [View all] RKP5637 Dec 2023 OP

F You Clarence Diamond_Dog Dec 2023 #1

And well said. I hate that moron!!! RKP5637 Dec 2023 #2

Question for Clarence StClone Dec 2023 #12

You beat me MOMFUDSKI Dec 2023 #3

He needs lots more free yacht time with his rich friends to get over this one. Scumbag! dutch777 Dec 2023 #4

Go fuck yourself your dishonor Blue Owl Dec 2023 #5

That violates "HIS" constitutional rights!!!!! As in "THE COUNSELORS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS! Maraya1969 Dec 2023 #6

F*** you, and your little dog, toto-alito, too! BComplex Dec 2023 #7

Too bad hypocrisy.. raising2moredems Dec 2023 #8

You can blame Arlen Specter for most of it. Butterflylady Dec 2023 #11

The plaintiff can talk about conversion therapy all he wants onenote Dec 2023 #9

The only 'converting' Conversion Therapy does, 70sEraVet Dec 2023 #10