Danes Claus Larsen and Steen Svanholm were present at the courtroom hearings and wrote this report:
http://911facts.dk/?page_id=7023
Concerning this interview video, Steen Svanholm wrote:
NH says he saw "astonishment" amongst the three judges. Interesting. His focus was on the video. Mine was directly on the judges. I could not see the movie since it was presented on the wall right behind me, but I was faced towards the judges, so really, all I could do during the video presentation was to look directly at the judges. There was absolutely no astonishment in their eyes, attitudes or body language. They were, as judges should be, impressively faceless and simply just watching the "show". A bit boredom at one of the judges was all I detected.
About the footnote from the NIST report, he read it all right, both in English and in Danish. However, the judges had a very hard time understanding the words, and they did not really seem to understand the point of Harrit reading the passage. In light of the case, being a libel case, a footnote from an American report on building structure seemed far fetched and inappropriate. I do not remember them reacting very much to it, just asking Harrit to read it several times so they could quote his quote correctly. They definitely did not understand, as Harrit claims, that the official accounts of the collapses were false.
Harrit talks about that it all boils down to what is "reasonable". I must agree on that. The difference is that Harrit talks about whether his science is reasonable and the case is about whether Villemoes' crackpot-statement is reasonable.
Thus, the High Court will most likely, just as the City Court, disregard anything not related to the the crackpot-statement.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=10527630#post10527630
= new reply since forum marked as read