Creative Speculation

William Seger

(11,177 posts)

23. There's no need to explain things that didn't happen

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 12:40 AM

Mar 2015

You posted an image of the piece of steel which was identified as being a eutectic reaction. You post absolutely no evidence that it had anything to do with the collapse, and since it most probably happened in the rubble pile after the collapse, there's no reason to presume that it did. You post nothing to prove that the molten metal that was observed was actually molten steel -- in fact, no real proof that it was molten metal instead of molten glass.

You claimed all I did was "deny" these things, but now all you want to do is tell us how unconvinced you are by the rational explanations, as if someone should be impressed by that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

LOL, YouTube gets it [View all] William Seger Mar 2015 OP

Youtube is owned by google jakeXT Mar 2015 #1

This new policy is going to put a dent in Gage's Vacation Fund (n/t) William Seger Mar 2015 #3

How so? wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #15

apparently you didn't. wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #2

Apparently I didn't what? William Seger Mar 2015 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #5

LOL William Seger Mar 2015 #6

i did leave it off and substituted www. instead... wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #7

LOL, "finally being correct" huh? William Seger Mar 2015 #8

but i do usually wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #9

That's okay William Seger Mar 2015 #10

Good thing that! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #11

Hard to say William Seger Mar 2015 #13

I think there is quite a few more than 3 or 4 and...just because they disagree with the wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #14

I ANSWER people who "question the official nonsense" William Seger Mar 2015 #16

molten steel and free fall acceleration! n/t wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #17

See edit above William Seger Mar 2015 #18

pssst! that video you originally posted about is here: wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #20

fema admits molten steel. Many eyewitnesses identified it! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #19

Instead of retracting your lie, you offer another one William Seger Mar 2015 #21

bullshit! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #22

There's no need to explain things that didn't happen William Seger Mar 2015 #23

fail! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #24

Dishonest arguments and recycled bullshit William Seger Mar 2015 #25

you're projecting! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #28

that would be over 1800 degrees F! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #26

Which is precisely the temperatures reached by the rubble pile fires William Seger Mar 2015 #27

what fueled those rubble piles william? wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #29

(Sigh) The office contents, obviously William Seger Mar 2015 #31

evaporated steel shows thermit evidence! n/t wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #32

No, it does not William Seger Mar 2015 #35

nope! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #36

"Truther" physicists, chemists, and metallurgists William Seger Mar 2015 #39

truther simply means they seek the truth! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #41

No, it does not; that's why I ALWAYS put "truther" in quotes William Seger Mar 2015 #42

doesn't matter what you think it means! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #44

You "want the truth" but William Seger Mar 2015 #46

I don't accept that you wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #47

there is not any evidence that the temps wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #30

(A) Yes, there is evidence, and... William Seger Mar 2015 #33

molten steel and free fall acceleration! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #34

My credibility is irrelevant William Seger Mar 2015 #37

those "experts" are lying to you! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #38

And 99.99% of their professional peers ignore them William Seger Mar 2015 #40

means nothing! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #43

It means they can't make a case William Seger Mar 2015 #45

This message was self-deleted by its author wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #12