Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
25. Ravitch started her blog in April 2012. That was when she became a prominent voice against
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 09:00 PM
Jul 2013

Last edited Sat Jul 13, 2013, 02:15 AM - Edit history (1)

at least some aspects of education deform.

People like Mad Floridian were posting at DU against ed deform at least by 2009, & there were anti ed-deform, anti-NCLB bloggers and others out there for years before that.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/5034

When did ravitch become a critic of NCLB (after supporting it heartily when it was developed)?

2010.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124209100

Her book came out in 2011.

She worked for the education-deform-promoting Fordham Foundation & the education-deform-promoting Koret Task Force at the Hoover Institution until 2009.

She suddenly became a critic after HW's son was safely out of office.

Seems like she's always a day late & a dollar short. And then -- "oh woe is me who could have known that the policy I supported would turn out to be so fucked up?"

Nothing like jumping in front of a parade.

But we're supposed to think ravitch is smarter than we are. No, we're smarter than she is, because we could see what a fucking sham the whole thing was before she did. She, who had a major role in developing & promoting the sham.




By Diane Ravitch and Randi Weingarten
Published: March 18, 2004

Two years ago, the State Legislature gave Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg nearly unlimited control of New York City's public schools. It abolished the central Board of Education and created a Panel on Education Policy (with eight members appointed by the mayor, five by the borough presidents) that is largely advisory. The move was a sharp departure from the American tradition of placing education policy in the hands of an independent public board that is not directly controlled by elected officials.

Hoping that this change would reduce bureaucratic inertia, we were among those who supported the measure in Albany. And we certainly commend Mayor Bloomberg for his willingness to take responsibility for improving the public schools. In recent days, however, many of us have realized that the legislation went too far by consolidating all power in the hands of one elected official.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/18/opinion/public-schools-minus-the-public.html



It's people like madflo that got ravitch involved, imo, & not the other way around. why is the $64K question.

In fact, if I were to use one word to describe ravitch's associations & career until she 'got religion,' it would be 'neoconservative'.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Weingarten is an obvious plant backed by the privatizers duffyduff Jul 2013 #1
Well, I'm glad to see Diane and Randi working together. Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #2
Diane isn't the problem. It's Randi. n/t duffyduff Jul 2013 #3
We must have read a different letter from Diane then. Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #4
Ravitch is a straight shooter most of the time. Igel Jul 2013 #5
"By and large those aren't (D) ideas." Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #6
I have always wondered about ravitch 'getting religion' after being one of the architects of the HiPointDem Jul 2013 #11
It's extremely obvious by now she is a mole, a plant duffyduff Jul 2013 #7
I read the thread. Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #8
Starry, most people in her home union don't even know they HAVE a union. Smarmie Doofus Jul 2013 #9
I find it hard to wrap my head around- Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #10
"I do know some people who have run on progressive slates in UFT elections and won." = not HiPointDem Jul 2013 #15
It was in NYC, actually. nt. Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #17
who? HiPointDem Jul 2013 #18
Why? Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #19
because when people make a claim they should be able to back it up. i'm not interested in HiPointDem Jul 2013 #20
LOL. Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #21
where did i call you a liar, or imply it? that's not very cool either. i asked you to back up HiPointDem Jul 2013 #22
Well then we're done. Good night! Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #23
noted. and here are my 'feelings:' when someone asks for a cite for a claim, that is a part of HiPointDem Jul 2013 #24
As veteran teachers are driven out by Danielson and the generally hostile work environment.... Smarmie Doofus Jul 2013 #27
Some of us don't live anywhere near NYC duffyduff Jul 2013 #16
he said he had asked his reps and couldn't get a clear answer. if so, the problem is with his reps, HiPointDem Jul 2013 #12
I have a feeling that the reactions to Diane's letter are probably only regional in scope. Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #13
i agree. but like randi's publicized 'arrest' after she'd just finished selling out some local HiPointDem Jul 2013 #14
Ravitch started her blog in April 2012. That was when she became a prominent voice against HiPointDem Jul 2013 #25
More comments on electoral processes within AFT from that blog post: HiPointDem Jul 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Diane Ravitch Praises Ran...»Reply #25