Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Metaphorical

(2,359 posts)
2. Weeding out barely surviving businesses
Wed Jul 10, 2024, 01:40 PM
Jul 2024

There are two ways of looking at stories such as this one. The media usually picks this up as:

1. Look at how terrible government regulation is, that businesses are having to cut back or shut down because the cost of labor is now so high.

or

2. If a business is dependent upon paying it's workers less than a living wage, then perhaps it shouldn't be in business in the first place.

Franchises have long been, to me, a truly exploitive business practice. Franchise owners end up paying a huge amount in licensing fees, specific (usually franchisor supplied) equipment, and so forth, then has to pay labor costs on top of that. The franchisor, on the other hand, bears almost none of the actual costs, keeps the operations mostly off their own books, doesn't have to pay for labor, yet still gets the marketing benefits of having the brand. Workers for the franchisees have no career mobility, have lousy benefits, and all too often are undocumented immigrants who have little recourse to legal representation.

I have to suspect that as demographic trends continue towards smaller (or no) families, franchises will be the canaries in the coal mine of businesses to go under because they are truly not viable without labor that will soon not be there..

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»California fast food work...»Reply #2