Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve's Labor Group

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Eugene

(62,832 posts)
Sun Aug 7, 2022, 12:25 PM Aug 2022

California appeals court rules no arbitration in Cisco caste bias case [View all]

Source: Reuters

California appeals court rules no arbitration in Cisco caste bias case

Paresh Dave
Fri, August 5, 2022 at 6:29 PM

OAKLAND, Calif. (Reuters) -Cisco Systems Inc on Friday lost a court appeal to move to private arbitration a case over alleged caste discrimination in its Silicon Valley offices, where managers of Indian descent are accused of bias against a fellow employee from India.

The networking gear and business software company has denied the allegations. It had argued to a California appeals court that the state's Civil Rights Department, which had brought the case on behalf of a worker identified under the pseudonym John Doe, should be subjected to an employment arbitration agreement signed by Doe.

"As an independent party, the Department cannot be compelled to arbitrate under an agreement it has not entered," the appellate panel wrote.

In a separate order Friday, it told a lower-court judge to reconsider a ruling that would have required the state to identify Doe. The lower court had said the law prevented it from considering whether Doe's family members in India could be harmed by naming him.

-snip-

Read more: https://news.yahoo.com/california-appeals-court-rules-no-222910662.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»California appeals court ...»Reply #0