Election Reform
In reply to the discussion: Why Do Democrats Ignore Massive Voter Suppression? [View all]eniwetok
(1,629 posts)I've always found it all that liberal Dems have no operative definition for voting rights. Sure, easy access to polls is a must. I'd also make sure those disenfranchised can vote.
But if elections are the tool to measure the popular will then we need to do more to insure voters have real choices... that they can vote their conscience and get representation for those beliefs. And if the political process is designed to implement the popular will then representation must be democratic. We can't stop at 1 person, 1 vote... but that all votes weigh the same in terms of representation. This has never, to my knowledge, been something Dems stood up for outside of state elections. On the federal level a mere 18% of the US population gets 52% of the seats in the Senate... and in our system the Senate just doesn't have a veto on the House... it has special powers that the House has no veto over... such as nominations and treaties.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)