Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

House of Roberts

(5,838 posts)
3. I am not defending anything.
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:55 AM
Jan 2014

I asked a question.

As I read the article, it doesn't mention that the bill prohibits any individual from buying insurance through the federal exchange, unless you're on TennCare. If the state refused the federal money, fewer people would have coverage through that version of Medicaid, but those eligible would still get signed up one way or the other.

The hospitals are going to push back if they have to treat people without compensation, who would otherwise have had their bills covered.

I'm not sure the bill will stand up as constitutional anyway. The lawmakers can probably get away with making state and local governments go directly to insurance companies to obtain employee coverage. My question had to do with if the coverages had to meet the same minimum standard.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Tennessee»TN lawmakers file bill to...»Reply #3