Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

slightlv

(5,550 posts)
5. Could it at all have been
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 11:41 PM
Jan 2025

because he thought it might let the cats have milk, without upsetting their lactose intolerance? I had one Japanese Bobtail that ADORED milk products. She'd fight you tooth and nail for them. But I always had lactose free milk products to give her... because I'm highly lactose intolerant. I guess I could see someone being confused by the pasteurized/unpasteurized and possible lactose issue. Just seems like this guy was up on everything else, why fall down in this? It just doesn't make much sense. I'd never give raw milk to any living creature. Most of them don't need it after they're weaned... WE don't either - if we kept up with Vit D otherwise.

I'm just hyper with my cats about what they eat, drink, and treats. I read more labels on THEIR food than I do on my own!

So sad about the kitties, tho... just so unnecessary. Breaks my heart.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»California man says two o...»Reply #5