Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SorellaLaBefana

(277 posts)
3. My thoughts exactly
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 05:24 PM
Apr 2024

Being a (nature) photographer as well as a painter (oil, acrylic, pastels—and dreadful watercolourist) I feel that it is not about 'purity', it is about photography non-destructively capturing reality versus all the other art forms which, also non-destructively, take a more nuanced look at the world.

To leave your subject injured or dead in order to 'get the image' is not something with which I am comfortable. If a plant or animal is beautiful enough to photograph, then it is beautiful enough to not harm. Same is, of course, true for less photogenic living beings.








Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»Water Photo Close Up Cont...»Reply #3