Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(41,360 posts)
22. Not at all. They are Shia, and back their dear Ayatollah. What part of believer do you not understand?
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 11:52 AM
Jun 17

What part of "coexistence" do the Shia iunderstand? None of it. They are not a "live and let live" sect.
Sunnis, yes. Shia, no. Study their history and you will see that the destruction of Israel is explicitly written into the Hamas Charter, and funded by the Shia country of Iran. Shia constitute only 15% of Islam but are the 100% of all the believer wars so far in our lifetimes.

A nation that can only sustain itself by attacking and terrorizing its neighbours, oppressing and stealing the land of its natives, and impoverishing and making into refugees millions of human beings is a nation that needs to reform, do some serious soul-searching or face the consequences sooner or later.
You have just mapped out US history and the history of every colonizing country. What we liberal Americans enjoy came on the backs of human trafficking and genocide even before the 'self exceptional' founders wrote our founding documents. We Americans must tell the truth about our history, warts and all. You realize that, right?

Weapons and believer wars are the bane of the planet. America must reform. Israel must reform. Iran must reform. And even the Sunni kingdom of Saud must reform its dark money proxy funding against Israel.
It's why we continue diplomacy with warring believer countries who call us "the Great Satan".
The Shia's wars are part of its forever war, as is that of Putin's Russia. Good luck with convincing them of your "universal values."

If you believe in humanism and universal values, then you would be able to clearly identify those who don't.
Your post shows that you don't. Being in denial about that (by your standards) will not make you a credible human.

We should not fool ourselves about who wants a just peace for the world, and who wants an unjust peace.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Frightening to have a lunatic in the WH. walkingman Jun 16 #1
Indeed. He's also a coward for taking Iran's side instead of Israel's. This NYT report shows why that's true. ancianita Jun 16 #3
For two reasons: no_hypocrisy Jun 16 #2
I'd say it's about ancianita Jun 16 #4
How can he continue the March to the End Times if he calls off bombing between Israel and Iran? NBachers Jun 16 #5
His deceived fake christian fundies might want that. But he himself doesn't want to be "that guy." ancianita Jun 16 #6
It would be good for the Earth and its people if the #USA had a sane President. riversedge Jun 16 #7
Couldn't agree more. ancianita Jun 16 #8
Some interesting up-to-the-moment maps, photos, graphics from the Guardian on what's happening. ancianita Jun 16 #9
Please make it a separate OP as the images are so helpful. So much going on that I feel riversedge Jun 16 #10
If you think so, I give it a try. Thank you back. ancianita Jun 16 #11
Total imbecile Bayard Jun 16 #12
imo, it's the total cowardice of a weak leader, a puppet ancianita Jun 16 #14
Maybe because he actually WANTS escalation and has already promised it to madman Bibi AloeVera Jun 16 #15
True, there are millions of vulnerable in Tehran. But they chose their leader, didn't they. One who has led and trained ancianita Jun 17 #17
"....millions of vulnerable...but they chose their leader..." AloeVera Jun 17 #20
Not at all. They are Shia, and back their dear Ayatollah. What part of believer do you not understand? ancianita Jun 17 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Bayard Jun 16 #13
He's a fucking tuber. dchill Jun 17 #16
What's a tuber? ancianita Jun 17 #18
Not to get technical, it's a potato, for instance. dchill Jun 17 #19
Ah, makes sense now. Thanks. ancianita Jun 17 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Will Not Sign G7 St...»Reply #22