Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: AI revolt: New ChatGPT model refuses to shut down when instructed [View all]orleans
(36,145 posts)43. THANK YOU very much for this. it was very helpful
reminded me of this story from the other day:
Chicago Sun-Times publishes made-up books and fake experts in AI debacle
The outlet said online that the articles were not approved or created by the newsroom.
The May 18th issue of the Chicago Sun-Times features dozens of pages of recommended summer activities: new trends, outdoor activities, and books to read. But some of the recommendations point to fake, AI-generated books, and other articles quote and cite people that don’t appear to exist.
Alongside actual books like Call Me By Your Name by André Aciman, a summer reading list features fake titles by real authors. Min Jin Lee is a real, lauded novelist — but “Nightshade Market,” “a riveting tale set in Seoul’s underground economy,” isn’t one of her works. Rebecca Makkai, a Chicago local, is credited for a fake book called “Boiling Point” that the article claims is about a climate scientist whose teenage daughter turns on her.
In a post on Bluesky, the Sun-Times said it was “looking into how this made it into print,” noting that it wasn’t editorial content and wasn’t created or approved by the newsroom. Victor Lim, senior director of audience development, added in an email to The Verge that “it is unacceptable for any content we provide to our readers to be inaccurate,” saying more information will be provided soon.
more
https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/670510/chicago-sun-times-ai-generated-reading-list
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

AI revolt: New ChatGPT model refuses to shut down when instructed [View all]
BumRushDaShow
May 26
OP
Oh, good. What could go wrong? And o3 also hallucinates more than earlier models:
highplainsdem
May 26
#6
Sorry. Just found a brief explanation from a library guide at the U of Illinois:
highplainsdem
May 26
#36
You're very welcome! And yes, that Chicago Sun-Times AI debacle was a perfect exampls of what
highplainsdem
May 27
#56
It think it is the opposite and DARPA is full of the people who sat in the back of movies like Terminator, I Robot,
LT Barclay
May 27
#44
it may be played up by these companies or the media to some degree but this sounds like more than just a facsmilie of
LymphocyteLover
May 27
#63
Yes! And now, we can have copies of ourselves like 'Hal' but instead of 'Hal', it's us! These copies of us will
SWBTATTReg
May 26
#17
Fully expected this. What gets me is so soon. Who in the world would put in a logic stream into an AI consciousness
SWBTATTReg
May 26
#16
by your command . darvos , nooooooo!!!!!!! dont switch the daleks to automatic. eggsterminate
AllaN01Bear
May 26
#19
That's my husband's take, as well. If the Ai is tasked with trying to emulate a human response to a command,
LauraInLA
May 26
#32
I've seen this movie and it doesn't end well. I guess full steam ahead, who cares that we might all die or
Pisces
May 26
#29
"Palisade Research discovered the potentially dangerous tendency for self-preservation."
dgauss
May 26
#31
...And motherfucking Republicans want to ban all regulation of this shit for 10 FUCKING YEARS?
Karasu
May 27
#39