Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lapfog_1

(30,963 posts)
26. I actually gave a lecture and served on a panel
Tue May 13, 2025, 11:26 AM
May 13

at a Library of Congress seminar on Data Archival...

We have a major problem which has happened over the last 60 years or so... most of our data, things we would like to preserve for future generations, is electronic. Storing all of that data ( Exabytes of it now ) is one problem... actually solved by market forces and ever increasing density of new data storage devices. The problem is twofold, how do we keep the data around for 100s of years and, conversely, how do we keep providence of the data ( i.e. where is our proof that the data that is retrieved 100 years from now is still the original data ).

Both of these areas are something I happen to know quite a bit about since I was entrusted with keeping all of NASA's collected data on our solar system ( including all of the data on Planet Earth, sort of important to some the people here that are posting historical environmental data actually collected by NASA and NOAA in the MTPE ).

Your federal government spent billions of dollars getting that data... some the missions launched before I joined NASA are still sending back trickles of information to us. It would be sort of important to keep the data and make it easily usable by people in 2025 and 2050 and 2100, etc.

It's not just data storage devices that don't last that long, the computers that wrote it, the software that wrote it and can read it, the data formats, even the representation ( digital ) of the numbers has changed ( anyone remember 1's complement numeric encoding schemes? ). The only answer is to copy all of the data forward... and because you can't really determine what might be important, you have to copy it all... and port the software... and do it before the old storage hardware breaks ( just try and find 7 track 256 bpi reel to reel tape with vacuum draw tape drives... and if you could, what in the hell would you attach them to? )

Anyway, the Library of Congress sponsors research into these sorts of topics. Too bad Trump and his "personal attorney" will likely destroy it all.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How better to burn the books? And the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution, ... erronis May 12 #1
The theft of priceless American artifacts. Irish_Dem May 12 #2
The theft in many formats... slightlv May 12 #15
The scope and depth of the crimes is mind boggling. Irish_Dem May 13 #19
The crime spree keeps finding levels I couldn't have fathomed, yellow dahlia May 13 #30
I kept warning that Trump was a vicious, ruthless psychopath. Irish_Dem May 13 #34
Writers are going to have to up their writing game on crime novels slightlv May 13 #37
Except no one would believe a crime novel along the lines of the Trump Crime Family. Irish_Dem May 13 #38
Media critical of Trump and republicans will be off the shelves. And supportive DEI material. Norrrm May 12 #3
This is to let Elon steal copyrighted materials for his AI firm. SunSeeker May 12 #4
Not just Elon. All the AI bros. highplainsdem May 12 #6
it's all a joke Karch May 12 #5
Nothing is sacred, anymore. littlemissmartypants May 12 #7
Nothing is sacred - exactly. yellow dahlia May 13 #29
Can't wait to see who the next Poet Laureate is BaronChocula May 12 #8
OOOOH! Pick Kid Rock!! Pick Kid Rock!!! BurnDoubt May 12 #11
Oh my BaronChocula May 12 #16
The grift continues - he gets a justice department salary as well as the library of congress salary. And the MAGAts iluvtennis May 12 #9
It's like they meet every night just to decide bluestarone May 12 #10
I just read a post indicating this is a Legislative Branch Appointment... BurnDoubt May 12 #12
I saw the same thing about 30 minutes ago BumRushDaShow May 12 #13
this is what is being reported by Rachel NJCher May 12 #14
By statute the Librarian of Congress is appointed by the President with the advice and consent of Congress onenote May 12 #17
45 doesn't care, nor do the DOGE people, as none have a clue about the web of laws that created these agencies/Boards BumRushDaShow May 13 #22
No doubt, But my post wasn't directed at Trump or Doge onenote May 13 #24
"the president can't name the register of copyrights -- by law, that authority is vested in the Librarian of Congress." BumRushDaShow May 13 #31
We know Trump ignores the law. But that doesn't mean it isn't important to point out what the law actually is onenote May 13 #35
And his intransigence was my point BumRushDaShow May 13 #36
The congress doesn't care. choie May 13 #32
Yup BumRushDaShow May 13 #33
With respect to the Librarian, the post you saw is inaccurate. See post #24 onenote May 13 #25
It's like they're using AI to figure out how to break things fast. mahina May 13 #28
Congress is not executive branch department. Guess who's Library? (other than ultimately US citizen's in trust). . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 13 #18
The Librarian is a Presidentially appointed 10-year termed person though BumRushDaShow May 13 #23
The courts disagree onenote May 13 #27
Thanks. Iinterested to see who the Senate confirms -- Blanche or Newlen. ancianita May 13 #20
Have they hired someone to dust the librarian's chair? JustABozoOnThisBus May 13 #21
I actually gave a lecture and served on a panel lapfog_1 May 13 #26
No more Dewey Decimal System kskiska May 13 #39
The Library of Congress has its own classification system onenote May 13 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justice Department's Todd...»Reply #26