Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

LetMyPeopleVote

(164,004 posts)

5. trump did not disclose his "agreement" or deal because there was no deal. This was an agreement to agree

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Original post)

Fri May 9, 2025, 08:38 PM

May 9

This "trade deal" was not a real deal but an agreement to agree that was by its own terms non-binding. In my world, this is called a letter of intent and this "trade deal" has the same non-binding language that is in all letters of intent'

Link to tweet

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US and UK expected to make announcements after Trump touts a 'major trade deal' [View all] Bernardo de La Paz May 8 OP

Who believes we had A trade problem with the UK? BootinUp May 8 #1

According to Krugman, this is all smoke and mirrors. It is a concept of a plan, that wasn't needed in the first place Martin68 May 8 #2

We actually have a trade surplus with the UK. LauraInLA May 8 #3

Maddow Blog-Trump's 'trade deal' with the United Kingdom isn't yet an actual trade deal LetMyPeopleVote May 9 #4

trump did not disclose his "agreement" or deal because there was no deal. This was an agreement to agree LetMyPeopleVote May 9 #5

Yes, Starmer on phone into Oval Office in presser said it was "the end of the beginning", not the end. . .nt Bernardo de La Paz May 9 #6