Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: DOJ places attorney on leave after struggling in Maryland migrant case [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(64,414 posts)37. It wasn't just Erez Rueveni.
Last edited Mon Apr 7, 2025, 12:05 PM - Edit history (1)
Joshua J. Friedman
@joshuajfriedman.com
Also!
Gabriel Malor @gabrielmalor.bsky.social
·
2h
While we're thinking about this, Erez Reuveni and Auggie Flentje are the only two counsels of record in the 4th Cir. appeal, at least for the moment.
Both are career DOJ put on administrative leave over the weekend by political appointees.
April 7, 2025 at 8:30 AM
@joshuajfriedman.com
Also!
Gabriel Malor @gabrielmalor.bsky.social
·
2h
While we're thinking about this, Erez Reuveni and Auggie Flentje are the only two counsels of record in the 4th Cir. appeal, at least for the moment.
Both are career DOJ put on administrative leave over the weekend by political appointees.
April 7, 2025 at 8:30 AM
https://bsky.app/profile/joshuajfriedman.com/post/3lm7xmkcxps2i
Gabriel Malor
@gabrielmalor.bsky.social
Follow
While we're thinking about this, Erez Reuveni and Auggie Flentje are the only two counsels of record in the 4th Cir. appeal, at least for the moment.
Both are career DOJ put on administrative leave over the weekend by political appointees.
Joshua J. Friedman @joshuajfriedman.com
·
2h
No word yet from the Fourth Circuit. I imagine we'll hear from them today, but at least for now, the government is required to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the US by midnight.
April 7, 2025 at 8:25 AM
@gabrielmalor.bsky.social
Follow
While we're thinking about this, Erez Reuveni and Auggie Flentje are the only two counsels of record in the 4th Cir. appeal, at least for the moment.
Both are career DOJ put on administrative leave over the weekend by political appointees.
Joshua J. Friedman @joshuajfriedman.com
·
2h
No word yet from the Fourth Circuit. I imagine we'll hear from them today, but at least for now, the government is required to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the US by midnight.
April 7, 2025 at 8:25 AM
https://bsky.app/profile/gabrielmalor.bsky.social/post/3lm7xf6urx222
Joshua J. Friedman
@joshuajfriedman.com
No word yet from the Fourth Circuit. I imagine we'll hear from them today, but at least for now, the government is required to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the US by midnight.
Joshua J. Friedman @joshuajfriedman.com
·
2d
NEW: Maryland federal judge Paula Xinis orders the Trump administration to "facilitate and effectuate the return" of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—the man the govt admits it erroneously deported to El Salvador—by no later than Monday.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs' Motion for Injunctive Relief pursuant to Rule 65 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, along with supporting memoranda, reply briefs, and the record in this case. ECF No. 6. The Defendants named in this suit are the United States Secretary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General of the United States, the United States Secretary of State, the Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement {"ICE"}, the Acting Executive Associate Director of ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations, and the Director of ICE's Baltimore Field Office {collectively, the "Defendants"}. ECF No. 1.
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia {"Abrego Garcia"}, a native of El Salvador, was granted withholding of removal in 2019, which prohibited his removal to El Salvador. The record reflects that Abrego Garcia was apprehended in Maryland without legal basis on March 12, 2025, and, without further process or legal justification, was removed to El Salvador by March 15, 2025.
Abrego Garcia is detained in El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center {Centro de
Confinamiento del Terrorismo or "CECOT"}. Plaintiffs contend that his removal violated 8 U.S.C.
ALT
§ 1231(b)(3)(A) and its implementing regulations, as well as the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), and other applicable legal protections.
Based on the record before the Court, I find that this Court retains subject matter
jurisdiction. I further find that: (1) Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits because Abrego
MalGarcia was remove
El Salvador in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act,
specifically,U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(A), and without any legal process; (2) his continued presence in El Salvador for obvious reasons, constitutes irreparable harm; (3) the balance of equities and the public interest weigh in favor of returning him to the United States; and (4) issuance of a preliminary injunction without further delay is necessary to restore him to the status quo and to avoid ongoing irreparable harm resulting from Abrego Garcia's unlawful removal. For the reasons stated above, the Court hereby DIRECTS Defendants to return Abrego Garcia to the United States no later than 11:59 PM on April 7th, 2025. A memorandum opinion further setting forth the basis for this ruling will be issued in due course.
Accordingly, it is this 4th day of April, 2025, by the United States District Court for the
District of Maryland, hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs' Motion (ECF No. 6), construed as one for preliminary injunctive relief, is
GRANTED;
2. Defendants are hereby ORDERED to facilitate and effectuate the return of Plaintiff
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the United States by no later than 11:59 PM on
Monday, April 7, 2025;
3. This preliminary relief is issued to restore the status quo and to preserve Abrego Garcia's access to due process in accordance with the Constitution and governing immigration
ALT
statutes;
4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSMIT copies of this Order to the parties.
Paula Xinis
United States District Judge
ALT
April 7, 2025 at 8:20 AM
@joshuajfriedman.com
No word yet from the Fourth Circuit. I imagine we'll hear from them today, but at least for now, the government is required to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the US by midnight.
Joshua J. Friedman @joshuajfriedman.com
·
2d
NEW: Maryland federal judge Paula Xinis orders the Trump administration to "facilitate and effectuate the return" of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—the man the govt admits it erroneously deported to El Salvador—by no later than Monday.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs' Motion for Injunctive Relief pursuant to Rule 65 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, along with supporting memoranda, reply briefs, and the record in this case. ECF No. 6. The Defendants named in this suit are the United States Secretary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General of the United States, the United States Secretary of State, the Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement {"ICE"}, the Acting Executive Associate Director of ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations, and the Director of ICE's Baltimore Field Office {collectively, the "Defendants"}. ECF No. 1.
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia {"Abrego Garcia"}, a native of El Salvador, was granted withholding of removal in 2019, which prohibited his removal to El Salvador. The record reflects that Abrego Garcia was apprehended in Maryland without legal basis on March 12, 2025, and, without further process or legal justification, was removed to El Salvador by March 15, 2025.
Abrego Garcia is detained in El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center {Centro de
Confinamiento del Terrorismo or "CECOT"}. Plaintiffs contend that his removal violated 8 U.S.C.
ALT
§ 1231(b)(3)(A) and its implementing regulations, as well as the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), and other applicable legal protections.
Based on the record before the Court, I find that this Court retains subject matter
jurisdiction. I further find that: (1) Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits because Abrego
MalGarcia was remove
El Salvador in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act,
specifically,U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(A), and without any legal process; (2) his continued presence in El Salvador for obvious reasons, constitutes irreparable harm; (3) the balance of equities and the public interest weigh in favor of returning him to the United States; and (4) issuance of a preliminary injunction without further delay is necessary to restore him to the status quo and to avoid ongoing irreparable harm resulting from Abrego Garcia's unlawful removal. For the reasons stated above, the Court hereby DIRECTS Defendants to return Abrego Garcia to the United States no later than 11:59 PM on April 7th, 2025. A memorandum opinion further setting forth the basis for this ruling will be issued in due course.
Accordingly, it is this 4th day of April, 2025, by the United States District Court for the
District of Maryland, hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs' Motion (ECF No. 6), construed as one for preliminary injunctive relief, is
GRANTED;
2. Defendants are hereby ORDERED to facilitate and effectuate the return of Plaintiff
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the United States by no later than 11:59 PM on
Monday, April 7, 2025;
3. This preliminary relief is issued to restore the status quo and to preserve Abrego Garcia's access to due process in accordance with the Constitution and governing immigration
ALT
statutes;
4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSMIT copies of this Order to the parties.
Paula Xinis
United States District Judge
ALT
April 7, 2025 at 8:20 AM
https://bsky.app/profile/joshuajfriedman.com/post/3lm7x4aclok2b
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Indefensible and the attorney admitted as much before the judge, according to MSNBC.
Eugene
Apr 5
#3
Bondi: At my direction, every Department of Justice attorney is required to zealously advocate on behalf of the United S
riversedge
Apr 5
#2
Yup. I can hear the judge now: "And before you answer the court's question, Ms. Bondi, remember that lying to the court
Trumpdumper
Apr 5
#11
So a lawyer loses his job for being unable to pretend something that's stupid isn't stupid?
cab67
Apr 6
#35
"We now need MAGA ardor rather than professional ability, I cannot expect that from the likes of you"
Best_man23
Apr 6
#36
Court of Appeals scolds the Justice Department for penalizing the lawyers who argued the case
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 7
#38