Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: White House eyes annual 8% cut to defense budget through 2030 [View all]kelly1mm
(5,617 posts)32. There are 100s of posts a month here on DU talking about how bloated the defense budget is. I am not
saying you personally ever said that but I would call that the mainstream position here on DU. If this goes through (highly unlikely) and the cumulative 34-37% cuts to the Pentagon are realized almost every sector of defense spending will be affected - including readiness. But I am not changing my position that defense spending needs to be cut (IMO by about 33% total) just because President Trump is the one who proposed it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f819/3f8191082cc674ff344b9d9427f285897071fb3f" alt=""
There is (IMO) for sure massive bloat in the defense department. I am actually in favor of these cuts and
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#4
With a cumulative 34-36% cut proposed I think almost everything would be cut if this comes to pass. This
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#25
I know a lot of planners and operational folks will be working around the clock to get this done.
COL Mustard
Thursday
#55
Yep! This is my thought #2. Although maybe the Democrats will cross the aisle to vote for the cuts? nt
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#10
An overall cut does not mean that everything gets cut at the same rate, or even that some projects are
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#12
That's a 40% - 50% reduction of the entire budget by 2030. The only upside is that F47 likely won't
in2herbs
Wednesday
#11
I read in another article it would be 34% cumulative as each subsequent year has a smaller $ base. nt
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#13
The headline says "White House eyes annual 8% cut to defense budget through 2030." nt
in2herbs
Wednesday
#14
In the article it explains it is 8% per year for 5 years. I agree the headline is not clear about that. nt
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#21
As An Overall Goal, This Is One of the First of the Felon's Initiatives I Can Get Behind
The Roux Comes First
Wednesday
#19
Putin would want cuts at any time. So not cutting because Putin would want that means no cuts ever. nt
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#22
Elon's Iron Dome contracts will eat up 5x as much as is being proposed to be cut.
NoMoreRepugs
Wednesday
#26
I don't support this at all. You're kidding yourselves if you think this won't affect readiness.
harumph
Wednesday
#27
There are 100s of posts a month here on DU talking about how bloated the defense budget is. I am not
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#32
Exactly. Thats my thought #2 and this is the test I have been waiting for. nt
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#33
Closures are long overdue as a lot of the bases were only established for recruitment and training for WWII.
cstanleytech
Wednesday
#36
I think cuts to the defense budget are a good in and of themselves. If that savings only went to
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#38
It is 8% per year for 5 years. Doubling that would be a cumulative 70% cut. IMO that is too much. nt
kelly1mm
Thursday
#50
I thought he wanted NATO members to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP
Northern_Light
Wednesday
#40