Latest Breaking News

gab13by13

(28,121 posts)

36. You are missing my point,

Fri Jan 17, 2025, 03:42 PM

Jan 2025

I am talking about Meadows and Patel being investigated as defendants in year 1. I am talking about Garland prosecuting Trump's inner circle, year 1 just like Robert Mueller did in less time.

Kash Patel and Mark Meadows should have been investigated and prosecuted by Garland early on in year one, or don't you believe that the theft of military/nuclear top secret classified documents was important enough?

How long did it take before the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago? It took 5 days for the FBI to search Joe's home.

It took Robert Mueller 22 months to indict and convict or get guilty pleas from numerous Trump cronies. Mueller did this during the Trump administration.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ pushing to keep Trump from blocking release of classified docs report on immunity grounds [View all] BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 OP

Sure... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #1

"garland himself has already stated cannon has no authority over those cases right now" BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #2

The case discussed in this article ... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #3

I just quoted you and but here is the rest of what you wrote BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #4

That's a whole lot of spaghetti sliding off the wall, Bum HereForTheParty Jan 2025 #5

There are 2 others who were charged in that case BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #8

Did I hit a nerve? HereForTheParty Jan 2025 #10

I prefer to provide FACTS BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #13

Garland should have dropped the charges on Nauta and Deoliver (or whatever this criminal's name is) choie Jan 2025 #37

Yes, that reply does seem like a lot of diversion and obfuscation... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #9

Yes, we know that garland didn't appoint Smith until... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #6

But here is the problem with this continued argument BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #11

One more time and then I gotta go... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #12

And one more time BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #14

those cases are not in her court. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #15

You keep saying "cases" BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #17

Obviously I'm referring to... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #18

No it's not "obvious" BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #19

The defendants who are appealing... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #21

You are STILL not reading nor comprehending (perhaps on purpose) BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #22

Correct, the cases against the co-defendants were not dropped... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #23

There are no "cases" against BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #24

Yes, she is having a hearing over... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #25

So should a Bailiff go into her Courtroom, haul her out in handcuffs, and lock her up for judicial misconduct BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #27

She SHOULD have recused herself before any of these cases started. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #29

That's IRRELEVANT BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #31

huh, thanks for your input. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #33

There is no case for immunity. He wasn't in office then. Unless they are able travelingthrulife Jan 2025 #7

Why not just give the report to President Biden and let him release it. republianmushroom Jan 2025 #16

Well interestingly enough, Biden just deemed the ERA "ratified" BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #20

DOJ should just release everything now and not worry about being stopped by TCF later Attilatheblond Jan 2025 #26

Just 3auld6phart Jan 2025 #28

Not afraid, complicit. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #30

They are under a COURT ORDER BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #32

I thought I was done with Garland, but I can't sit back. gab13by13 Jan 2025 #34

Do you remember this - BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #35

You are missing my point, gab13by13 Jan 2025 #36

"You are missing my point," BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #38

Ha ha ha , today is friday kacekwl Jan 2025 #39

President Biden kacekwl Jan 2025 #40