Latest Breaking News

gab13by13

(25,987 posts)

34. I thought I was done with Garland, but I can't sit back.

Fri Jan 17, 2025, 02:11 PM

Jan 17

Garland investigated a lot those 1st 2 years, took people's phones, then gave them back. let's look at results:

Robert Mueller couldn't go after Trump because he was a sitting president, but Mueller went after the people directly working for Trump.

Mueller indicted or got guilty pleas from:

George Popadopoulas
Paul Manafort
Rick Gates
Michael Flynn
Richard Pinedo
Alex van der Zwaan
Michael Cohen
Roger Stone
Sam Patten

Mueller did this working under the Trump administration. Mueller also teed up evidence for Garland to prosecute Trump for 10 obstruction of justice charges, and individual one, which Garland passed on and Alvin Bragg stepped up.

Merrick Garland convicted Peter Navarro (not sure he would have without the criminal referral from the J6 committee)
Steve Bannon was not working for Trump but Garland did convict him.

Regarding the documents case:

Mark Meadows and Kash Patel helped Trump steal the classified documents, neither one of them was president. Just imagine if Garland had prosecuted those 2 people early on, year 1. Kash Patel may be in prison instead of becoming our next FBI Director. Also if Garland had prosecuted Trump's inner circle early on it would have created a different climate which may have deterred the Supreme Court from intervening.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ pushing to keep Trump from blocking release of classified docs report on immunity grounds [View all] BumRushDaShow Jan 17 OP

Sure... Think. Again. Jan 17 #1

"garland himself has already stated cannon has no authority over those cases right now" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #2

The case discussed in this article ... Think. Again. Jan 17 #3

I just quoted you and but here is the rest of what you wrote BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #4

That's a whole lot of spaghetti sliding off the wall, Bum HereForTheParty Jan 17 #5

There are 2 others who were charged in that case BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #8

Did I hit a nerve? HereForTheParty Jan 17 #10

I prefer to provide FACTS BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #13

Garland should have dropped the charges on Nauta and Deoliver (or whatever this criminal's name is) choie Jan 17 #37

Yes, that reply does seem like a lot of diversion and obfuscation... Think. Again. Jan 17 #9

Yes, we know that garland didn't appoint Smith until... Think. Again. Jan 17 #6

But here is the problem with this continued argument BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #11

One more time and then I gotta go... Think. Again. Jan 17 #12

And one more time BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #14

those cases are not in her court. Think. Again. Jan 17 #15

You keep saying "cases" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #17

Obviously I'm referring to... Think. Again. Jan 17 #18

No it's not "obvious" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #19

The defendants who are appealing... Think. Again. Jan 17 #21

You are STILL not reading nor comprehending (perhaps on purpose) BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #22

Correct, the cases against the co-defendants were not dropped... Think. Again. Jan 17 #23

There are no "cases" against BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #24

Yes, she is having a hearing over... Think. Again. Jan 17 #25

So should a Bailiff go into her Courtroom, haul her out in handcuffs, and lock her up for judicial misconduct BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #27

She SHOULD have recused herself before any of these cases started. Think. Again. Jan 17 #29

That's IRRELEVANT BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #31

huh, thanks for your input. Think. Again. Jan 17 #33

There is no case for immunity. He wasn't in office then. Unless they are able travelingthrulife Jan 17 #7

Why not just give the report to President Biden and let him release it. republianmushroom Jan 17 #16

Well interestingly enough, Biden just deemed the ERA "ratified" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #20

DOJ should just release everything now and not worry about being stopped by TCF later Attilatheblond Jan 17 #26

Just 3auld6phart Jan 17 #28

Not afraid, complicit. Think. Again. Jan 17 #30

They are under a COURT ORDER BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #32

I thought I was done with Garland, but I can't sit back. gab13by13 Jan 17 #34

Do you remember this - BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #35

You are missing my point, gab13by13 Jan 17 #36

"You are missing my point," BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #38

Ha ha ha , today is friday kacekwl Jan 17 #39

President Biden kacekwl Jan 17 #40