Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(146,180 posts)
32. They are under a COURT ORDER
Fri Jan 17, 2025, 02:02 PM
Jan 17

The hearing for it is going on about it this afternoon -

Cannon holds hearing on Trump documents report as Democrats urge its release

January 17, 2025 at 12:03 p.m. EST Today at 12:03 p.m. EST

By Jeremy Roebuck and Perry Stein


FORT PIERCE, Florida — A federal judge on Friday will consider whether to block the Justice Department from sharing with key congressional leaders a report by special counsel Jack Smith on the classified documents investigation involving President-elect Donald Trump.

Trump’s lawyers want to keep Judiciary committee leaders from getting the report at least until Monday’s inauguration — and perhaps, as a result, for good.

U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon has scheduled an afternoon hearing to weigh their arguments that prosecutors’ plans for a limited disclosure of Smith’s findings into Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents and obstruction of efforts to retrieve them would undermine his presidential transition “and his ability to govern our nation going forward.”

The court battle comes after Cannon’s controversial decision last year to dismiss charges Smith’s office brought against Trump and two co-defendants over those allegations and just days after Attorney General Merrick Garland made public another portion of the special counsel’s report. That volume detailed what Smith described as Trump’s “unprecedented criminal effort” to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

(snip)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sure... Think. Again. Jan 17 #1
"garland himself has already stated cannon has no authority over those cases right now" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #2
The case discussed in this article ... Think. Again. Jan 17 #3
I just quoted you and but here is the rest of what you wrote BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #4
That's a whole lot of spaghetti sliding off the wall, Bum HereForTheParty Jan 17 #5
There are 2 others who were charged in that case BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #8
Did I hit a nerve? HereForTheParty Jan 17 #10
I prefer to provide FACTS BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #13
Garland should have dropped the charges on Nauta and Deoliver (or whatever this criminal's name is) choie Jan 17 #37
Yes, that reply does seem like a lot of diversion and obfuscation... Think. Again. Jan 17 #9
Yes, we know that garland didn't appoint Smith until... Think. Again. Jan 17 #6
But here is the problem with this continued argument BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #11
One more time and then I gotta go... Think. Again. Jan 17 #12
And one more time BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #14
those cases are not in her court. Think. Again. Jan 17 #15
You keep saying "cases" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #17
Obviously I'm referring to... Think. Again. Jan 17 #18
No it's not "obvious" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #19
The defendants who are appealing... Think. Again. Jan 17 #21
You are STILL not reading nor comprehending (perhaps on purpose) BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #22
Correct, the cases against the co-defendants were not dropped... Think. Again. Jan 17 #23
There are no "cases" against BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #24
Yes, she is having a hearing over... Think. Again. Jan 17 #25
So should a Bailiff go into her Courtroom, haul her out in handcuffs, and lock her up for judicial misconduct BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #27
She SHOULD have recused herself before any of these cases started. Think. Again. Jan 17 #29
That's IRRELEVANT BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #31
huh, thanks for your input. Think. Again. Jan 17 #33
There is no case for immunity. He wasn't in office then. Unless they are able travelingthrulife Jan 17 #7
Why not just give the report to President Biden and let him release it. republianmushroom Jan 17 #16
Well interestingly enough, Biden just deemed the ERA "ratified" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #20
DOJ should just release everything now and not worry about being stopped by TCF later Attilatheblond Jan 17 #26
Just 3auld6phart Jan 17 #28
Not afraid, complicit. Think. Again. Jan 17 #30
They are under a COURT ORDER BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #32
I thought I was done with Garland, but I can't sit back. gab13by13 Jan 17 #34
Do you remember this - BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #35
You are missing my point, gab13by13 Jan 17 #36
"You are missing my point," BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #38
Ha ha ha , today is friday kacekwl Jan 17 #39
President Biden kacekwl Jan 17 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DOJ pushing to keep Trump...»Reply #32