Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Think. Again.

(22,330 posts)

29. She SHOULD have recused herself before any of these cases started.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Reply #27)

Fri Jan 17, 2025, 02:55 PM

Jan 2025

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ pushing to keep Trump from blocking release of classified docs report on immunity grounds [View all] BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 OP

Sure... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #1

"garland himself has already stated cannon has no authority over those cases right now" BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #2

The case discussed in this article ... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #3

I just quoted you and but here is the rest of what you wrote BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #4

That's a whole lot of spaghetti sliding off the wall, Bum HereForTheParty Jan 2025 #5

There are 2 others who were charged in that case BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #8

Did I hit a nerve? HereForTheParty Jan 2025 #10

I prefer to provide FACTS BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #13

Garland should have dropped the charges on Nauta and Deoliver (or whatever this criminal's name is) choie Jan 2025 #37

Yes, that reply does seem like a lot of diversion and obfuscation... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #9

Yes, we know that garland didn't appoint Smith until... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #6

But here is the problem with this continued argument BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #11

One more time and then I gotta go... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #12

And one more time BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #14

those cases are not in her court. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #15

You keep saying "cases" BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #17

Obviously I'm referring to... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #18

No it's not "obvious" BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #19

The defendants who are appealing... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #21

You are STILL not reading nor comprehending (perhaps on purpose) BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #22

Correct, the cases against the co-defendants were not dropped... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #23

There are no "cases" against BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #24

Yes, she is having a hearing over... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #25

So should a Bailiff go into her Courtroom, haul her out in handcuffs, and lock her up for judicial misconduct BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #27

She SHOULD have recused herself before any of these cases started. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #29

That's IRRELEVANT BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #31

huh, thanks for your input. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #33

There is no case for immunity. He wasn't in office then. Unless they are able travelingthrulife Jan 2025 #7

Why not just give the report to President Biden and let him release it. republianmushroom Jan 2025 #16

Well interestingly enough, Biden just deemed the ERA "ratified" BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #20

DOJ should just release everything now and not worry about being stopped by TCF later Attilatheblond Jan 2025 #26

Just 3auld6phart Jan 2025 #28

Not afraid, complicit. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #30

They are under a COURT ORDER BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #32

I thought I was done with Garland, but I can't sit back. gab13by13 Jan 2025 #34

Do you remember this - BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #35

You are missing my point, gab13by13 Jan 2025 #36

"You are missing my point," BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #38

Ha ha ha , today is friday kacekwl Jan 2025 #39

President Biden kacekwl Jan 2025 #40