Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(146,181 posts)

22. You are STILL not reading nor comprehending (perhaps on purpose)

Fri Jan 17, 2025, 12:58 PM

Jan 17

"CHARGES WERE DROPPED" for 45 from the ONE CASE (Classified Documents).

But the CHARGES HAVE NOT BEEN DROPPED FOR NAUTA AND DE OLIVEIRA who were ALSO on that ONE CASE.

THAT is the debate.

DOJ had wanted to continue to pursue a trial for the roles of the above two defendants and "Democrats" (in quotes - as it is a mix of many from Congress and other politicos and legal analysts) are pushing DOJ to drop those charges against those 2, with the assumption that doing so would clear a hurdle for releasing the report.

HERE was the announcement of the original indictments for this case - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143085552

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ pushing to keep Trump from blocking release of classified docs report on immunity grounds [View all] BumRushDaShow Jan 17 OP

Sure... Think. Again. Jan 17 #1

"garland himself has already stated cannon has no authority over those cases right now" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #2

The case discussed in this article ... Think. Again. Jan 17 #3

I just quoted you and but here is the rest of what you wrote BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #4

That's a whole lot of spaghetti sliding off the wall, Bum HereForTheParty Jan 17 #5

There are 2 others who were charged in that case BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #8

Did I hit a nerve? HereForTheParty Jan 17 #10

I prefer to provide FACTS BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #13

Garland should have dropped the charges on Nauta and Deoliver (or whatever this criminal's name is) choie Jan 17 #37

Yes, that reply does seem like a lot of diversion and obfuscation... Think. Again. Jan 17 #9

Yes, we know that garland didn't appoint Smith until... Think. Again. Jan 17 #6

But here is the problem with this continued argument BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #11

One more time and then I gotta go... Think. Again. Jan 17 #12

And one more time BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #14

those cases are not in her court. Think. Again. Jan 17 #15

You keep saying "cases" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #17

Obviously I'm referring to... Think. Again. Jan 17 #18

No it's not "obvious" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #19

The defendants who are appealing... Think. Again. Jan 17 #21

You are STILL not reading nor comprehending (perhaps on purpose) BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #22

Correct, the cases against the co-defendants were not dropped... Think. Again. Jan 17 #23

There are no "cases" against BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #24

Yes, she is having a hearing over... Think. Again. Jan 17 #25

So should a Bailiff go into her Courtroom, haul her out in handcuffs, and lock her up for judicial misconduct BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #27

She SHOULD have recused herself before any of these cases started. Think. Again. Jan 17 #29

That's IRRELEVANT BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #31

huh, thanks for your input. Think. Again. Jan 17 #33

There is no case for immunity. He wasn't in office then. Unless they are able travelingthrulife Jan 17 #7

Why not just give the report to President Biden and let him release it. republianmushroom Jan 17 #16

Well interestingly enough, Biden just deemed the ERA "ratified" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #20

DOJ should just release everything now and not worry about being stopped by TCF later Attilatheblond Jan 17 #26

Just 3auld6phart Jan 17 #28

Not afraid, complicit. Think. Again. Jan 17 #30

They are under a COURT ORDER BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #32

I thought I was done with Garland, but I can't sit back. gab13by13 Jan 17 #34

Do you remember this - BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #35

You are missing my point, gab13by13 Jan 17 #36

"You are missing my point," BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #38

Ha ha ha , today is friday kacekwl Jan 17 #39

President Biden kacekwl Jan 17 #40