Latest Breaking News

Think. Again.

(19,923 posts)

12. One more time and then I gotta go...

Fri Jan 17, 2025, 10:50 AM

15 hrs ago

The documents case is currently in an appeals court, cannon has no jurisdiction over it at the moment.

Also, whatever work garland scuttled when he appointed Smith 2 years after Jan. 6 was just that, scuttled. Smith began his work 2 years after Jan. 6., bringing his time-frame to convict down to 1 year and 3 months before the election.

I'm assuming garland has some idea of how long a case like this would need.

Edit to add:

And yes, I am still not interested in the cases against the Capital mob.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

republianmushroom

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ pushing to keep Trump from blocking release of classified docs report on immunity grounds [View all] BumRushDaShow 21 hrs ago OP

Sure... Think. Again. 20 hrs ago #1

"garland himself has already stated cannon has no authority over those cases right now" BumRushDaShow 20 hrs ago #2

The case discussed in this article ... Think. Again. 19 hrs ago #3

I just quoted you and but here is the rest of what you wrote BumRushDaShow 18 hrs ago #4

That's a whole lot of spaghetti sliding off the wall, Bum HereForTheParty 17 hrs ago #5

There are 2 others who were charged in that case BumRushDaShow 16 hrs ago #8

Did I hit a nerve? HereForTheParty 16 hrs ago #10

I prefer to provide FACTS BumRushDaShow 15 hrs ago #13

Garland should have dropped the charges on Nauta and Deoliver (or whatever this criminal's name is) choie 11 hrs ago #37

Yes, that reply does seem like a lot of diversion and obfuscation... Think. Again. 16 hrs ago #9

Yes, we know that garland didn't appoint Smith until... Think. Again. 17 hrs ago #6

But here is the problem with this continued argument BumRushDaShow 16 hrs ago #11

One more time and then I gotta go... Think. Again. 15 hrs ago #12

And one more time BumRushDaShow 15 hrs ago #14

those cases are not in her court. Think. Again. 15 hrs ago #15

You keep saying "cases" BumRushDaShow 14 hrs ago #17

Obviously I'm referring to... Think. Again. 14 hrs ago #18

No it's not "obvious" BumRushDaShow 14 hrs ago #19

The defendants who are appealing... Think. Again. 14 hrs ago #21

You are STILL not reading nor comprehending (perhaps on purpose) BumRushDaShow 13 hrs ago #22

Correct, the cases against the co-defendants were not dropped... Think. Again. 13 hrs ago #23

There are no "cases" against BumRushDaShow 13 hrs ago #24

Yes, she is having a hearing over... Think. Again. 13 hrs ago #25

So should a Bailiff go into her Courtroom, haul her out in handcuffs, and lock her up for judicial misconduct BumRushDaShow 12 hrs ago #27

She SHOULD have recused herself before any of these cases started. Think. Again. 12 hrs ago #29

That's IRRELEVANT BumRushDaShow 12 hrs ago #31

huh, thanks for your input. Think. Again. 12 hrs ago #33

There is no case for immunity. He wasn't in office then. Unless they are able travelingthrulife 17 hrs ago #7

Why not just give the report to President Biden and let him release it. republianmushroom 15 hrs ago #16

Well interestingly enough, Biden just deemed the ERA "ratified" BumRushDaShow 14 hrs ago #20

DOJ should just release everything now and not worry about being stopped by TCF later Attilatheblond 12 hrs ago #26

Just 3auld6phart 12 hrs ago #28

Not afraid, complicit. Think. Again. 12 hrs ago #30

They are under a COURT ORDER BumRushDaShow 12 hrs ago #32

I thought I was done with Garland, but I can't sit back. gab13by13 12 hrs ago #34

Do you remember this - BumRushDaShow 12 hrs ago #35

You are missing my point, gab13by13 12 hrs ago #36

"You are missing my point," BumRushDaShow 10 hrs ago #38

Ha ha ha , today is friday kacekwl 7 hrs ago #39

President Biden kacekwl 7 hrs ago #40