Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Beastly Boy

(11,598 posts)
12. Other than "cast doubt" on the available evidence,
Fri Dec 6, 2024, 11:32 PM
Dec 6

did CNN's thorough investigation produce any additional doubt free evidence to counter the GPS-verified evidence they doubt?

Does CNN have possession of any video that confirms the very doubtful testimony of, I recall, a total of two alleged eyewitnesses out of a crowd of hundreds and an unknown number of unidentified experts whose expertise is undetermined? You know, some evidence that passes the test of journalistic integrity beyond the standards of "Ancient Aliens"? You know, something that exceeds the threshold of mere speculations that they claim constitutes evidence ?

You know what lying means, don't you? It is an act of contradicting established facts. What facts did CNN establish that contradict what IDF videos show? On the other hand, the testimony of the two eyewitnesses contradict the evidence shown in the IDF video. The forensic and ballistics experts do not establish the source of automatic gunfire, and the IDF video clearly shows non-IDF gunmen firing automatic weapons in close proximity of the crowds.

Myself, I have doubts, as per the above, that CNN was conducting an impartial investigation. Do my doubts turn CNN into, to put it bluntly, liars?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UN says it is halting aid...»Reply #12