Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Announcements
Showing Original Post only (View all)We made some changes to the Forum Hosting system today [View all]
This discussion thread was locked by Skinner (a host of the Announcements group).
The previous system had a number of problems which basically boiled down to too many people trying to do the job, not enough turnover, and too much ambiguity in what should and should not be locked (particularly in the General Discussion forum). Put it all together and we had a recipe for counter-productive infighting which caused way too many unnecessary problems (particularly for a job which should merely be the mundane task of occasionally locking off-topic threads).
Here are the changes we have made:
- The access-restricted Hosts Forum is now for Forum Hosts only. (Group Hosts can discuss group-related issues via DU Mail or other means.)
- The number of Forum Host slots has been reduced from 140 to 30. The 30 Forum Hosts are no longer responsible for individual forums, they are responsible for all main forums which require hosting (Welcome & Help, Latest Breaking News, Good Reads, Video & Multimedia, Politics 2014, General Discussion, and The DU Lounge).
- Since Forum Hosts are now responsible for all forums, there are no longer individual Wait Lists for each forum. There is now a single Wait List. Once Hosts have served their 90-day term, they must sign up again and join the bottom of the Wait List if they want to serve again.
- Members must now maintain a 100% chance of serving on a jury if they want to serve as a Forum Host.
- Due to the large amounts of confusion among members and Hosts alike over what kind of threads are permitted in the General Discussion forum, we have written an addendum to the General Discussion forum Statement Of Purpose which we hope makes things much clearer. You can view it here.
The DU Administrators
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hmmm. I feel your worries about juries are tending towards the Discussionist thread
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2014
#36
If you're talking, *in a thread about hosts*, about juries being about 'popularity'
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2014
#48
If hosts are hiding individual posts, we're back to the old moderator system--in this case that
MADem
Jul 2014
#16
I think things will get better once we find ourselves in general election season.
MADem
Jul 2014
#23
Hosts only consider the OP. Does it meet the SOP or not, replies to the OP are up to a jury.
Autumn
Jul 2014
#43
Was that intentional (i.e.. differentiating thread from OP)? I'm wondering if we are over-reading.
hlthe2b
Jul 2014
#14
it seems like any hosting decision or discussion can simply take place as an OP in the group
CreekDog
Jul 2014
#46
Only thing left to do is get rid of the juries and DU will be in good shape.
Renew Deal
Jul 2014
#26
The moderation simply hid a lot of problems, and it also created a "brook no dissent" mentality.
MADem
Jul 2014
#30
Thank you for putting me on the host list but I am retiring, letting my position go to the next pers
uppityperson
Jul 2014
#38
you made sure that in revamping host membership that diversity was maintained?
CreekDog
Jul 2014
#41
Curious: what happens if people on the waitlist get a hide, and drop below 100%
petronius
Aug 2014
#58