Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

still_one

(97,255 posts)
1. If they are going through the federal exchanges, that implies that Alabama did not implement their
Wed Aug 10, 2016, 10:44 AM
Aug 2016

own exchanges. I would suspect Alabama also didn't expand Medicaid in their state

40% is too high and indicates price gouging

I thought they could not raise the rates that much

If they fall within certain incomes that cost can be subsidized

If they don't, and the premium exceeds a certain percentage point f their way become they can elect to forgo signing up without penalty

This is why we need both a Democratic Senate and House if we really want to see meaningful healthcare, and this means more progressives being elected

and for those that believe Medicare for all is the answer, depending on the Medicare coverage, supplemental plan etc, it can get costly also

A single payer or public option or even Medicare for all would be the way to go, but it will take time, unless Congress becomes more progressive

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Alabama»Blue Cross proposes rate ...»Reply #1