Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WhiskeyGrinder

(24,843 posts)
1. Here's a free link.
Sat Apr 26, 2025, 09:32 PM
Apr 26
https://archive.ph/qfrEQ

The surprising thing about Donald Trump’s policies is that people are still surprised by them. Headlines express shock and disbelief whenever Trump assaults another pillar of the global liberal order — for example by supporting Russia’s claims for Ukrainian territory, contemplating the forced annexation of Greenland or unleashing financial chaos with his tariff announcements. Yet his policies are so consistent, and his vision of the world so clearly defined, that by this stage only wilful self-deception can account for any surprise.

Supporters of the liberal order see the world as a potentially win-win network of co-operation. They believe that conflict is not inevitable, because co-operation can be mutually beneficial. This belief has deep philosophical roots. Liberals argue that all humans share some common experiences and interests, which can form the basis for universal values, global institutions and international laws. For example, all humans abhor illness and have a common interest in preventing the spread of contagious diseases. So all countries would benefit from the sharing of medical knowledge, global efforts to eradicate epidemics and the establishment of institutions like the World Health Organization that co-ordinate such efforts. Similarly, when liberals look at the flow of ideas, goods and people between countries, they tend to understand it in terms of potential mutual benefits rather than inevitable competition and exploitation.

In the Trumpian vision, by contrast, the world is seen as a zero-sum game in which every transaction involves winners and losers. The movement of ideas, goods and people is therefore inherently suspect. In Trump’s world, international agreements, organisations and laws cannot be anything but a plot to weaken some countries and strengthen others — or perhaps a plot to weaken all countries and benefit a sinister cosmopolitan elite.

What, then, is Trump’s preferred alternative? If he could reshape the world according to his wishes, what would it look like?

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Does anyone subscribe to Financial Times? [View all] question everything Apr 26 OP
Here's a free link. WhiskeyGrinder Apr 26 #1
Thank you very very much! question everything Apr 26 #2
Use the archive, Luke! 🛸 usonian Apr 26 #3
Thank you. Here I did not know the URL, but WhiskeyGrinder got it question everything Apr 26 #4
WhiskeyGrinder types faster than I can! usonian Apr 26 #5
Quite useful. Even for slower typists question everything Apr 26 #6
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does anyone subscribe to ...»Reply #1