General Discussion

TomSlick

(12,403 posts)

22. Judges don't like parties coming to or going from their courtroom to be arrested or served with civil process.

Reply to senseandsensibility (Original post)

Fri Apr 25, 2025, 07:39 PM

Apr 25

They don't want parties to not come to court when required. However, there is usually no law against it. If there is a state law, it would be preempted by federal law.

Law enforcement, state or federal, would do well to not make arrests or serve process on parties coming or going from a court hearing. Judges have long memories and will find some way to make their displeasure known.

Charging a judge is an unnecessary overreach and may have consequences.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

k55f5r raging moderate

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jamie Raskin's take on the arrest of the Judge [View all] senseandsensibility Apr 25 OP

"The so-called Rule of Law is for proles, not magat G.O.P.ers" - magat GOPers BoRaGard Apr 25 #1

"We must do whatever we can..." dchill Apr 25 #2

What do people do? stillcool Apr 25 #6

It is not money they crave. Codifer Apr 25 #12

And then, Mr. Evil Apr 25 #14

yeah but it's a common refrain stillcool Apr 25 #23

The military is key. Codifer Apr 25 #25

Remember Hegseth defended the war criminal TommyT139 Apr 25 #29

And the word, "POWER"... GiqueCee Apr 26 #32

This, massively Magoo48 Apr 26 #33

Lead, fight or get out of the way. Basso8vb Apr 25 #9

Sick of hearing that. writerJT Apr 25 #28

This is a fascist coup. Do whatever you CAN'T. usonian Apr 25 #3

Oh yes Hornedfrog2000 Apr 25 #4

you haven't been listening stillcool Apr 25 #7

What the fuck does that mean!? Mr. Evil Apr 25 #15

My guess is that it refers to the fact that prominent Dems ARE saying it, but it gets drowned out. summer_in_TX Apr 26 #31

Yep. The question is what is in it for Rupert Murdoch? kerry-is-my-prez Apr 26 #40

Murdoch and Roger Ailes and others are to blame. summer_in_TX Apr 26 #44

K&R Evolve Dammit Apr 25 #8

Can a judge toss this? lame54 Apr 25 #5

Branches of government Iamscrewed Apr 25 #10

I am mad as HELL hannah Apr 25 #11

Time to use people power - Nigrum Cattus Apr 25 #13

Raskin is one of my favorite Dems. Passages Apr 25 #16

And knowing him senseandsensibility Apr 25 #17

I expect nothing less. Passages Apr 25 #18

Shit is getting more serious.. what will they do? Meowmee Apr 25 #19

Hang on.....anything can happen now and I'll see you in the streets.... 634-5789 Apr 25 #20

The SCJ Jughead Apr 25 #21

Judges don't like parties coming to or going from their courtroom to be arrested or served with civil process. TomSlick Apr 25 #22

There should be state legislation protecting against illegal Federal seizures, and protecting state and county courts nt AntiFascist Apr 26 #35

Any such state legislation would be preempted by federal law. TomSlick Apr 26 #41

Possibly in the case of undocumented immigrants, but let me put this in stronger terms... AntiFascist Apr 26 #43

I want to know who is calling the plays. It can't be Djt he doesn't think that far ahead. usaf-vet Apr 25 #24

The Supreme Court Justices are next Farmer-Rick Apr 25 #26

I'm waiting for condemnation of the "guidance"... pat_k Apr 25 #27

The abductors wore no identification, TommyT139 Apr 25 #30

Interesting. not fooled Apr 26 #34

Did the ICE agents identify themselves and have a warrant? AntiFascist Apr 26 #36

The 47 regime: Bullying and intimidation for billionaires. pat_k Apr 26 #38

I don't get why FBI agents were acting on ICE's orders? FakeNoose Apr 26 #37

My understanding: the federal charge is obstructing an ICE arrest pat_k Apr 26 #39

Congressman Raskin on Rachel on this arrest LetMyPeopleVote Apr 26 #42