General Discussion

malaise

(280,463 posts)

41. Tell Donvict

Reply to Daleuhlmann (Reply #38)

Thu Jan 23, 2025, 03:50 PM

Jan 23

And welcome to DU😀

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

calimary

81 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Breaking Birthright Citizenship order blocked by Judge [View all] malaise Jan 23 OP

Good news, but any deets? nt Wounded Bear Jan 23 #1

Here malaise Jan 23 #2

Thanks. I never doubt your veracity myself, but the board has standards... Wounded Bear Jan 23 #3

The link was 8 minutes old malaise Jan 23 #4

Nice to see my home state is on the front line of this one... Wounded Bear Jan 23 #5

Isn't that Ari's home state as well? malaise Jan 23 #6

Ari Melber? Never heard that, but I don't follow celebrity bios much...nt Wounded Bear Jan 23 #7

Yep malaise Jan 23 #8

Here's why I discovered that malaise Jan 23 #29

off topic- Jimi Hendrix statue Seattle. spike jones Jan 23 #46

Seriously sweet malaise Jan 23 #47

Gah what does this part mean? intrepidity Jan 23 #9

Current interpretations and precedents say... Wounded Bear Jan 23 #14

Agreed - illegal aliens are certainly subject to the jurisdiction of the US - they don't enjoy diplomatic immunity - Midwestern Democrat Jan 24 #78

I agree with the judge, I can't believe a member of the bar made that argument. SunSeeker Jan 23 #23

The judge laughed that out of the court malaise Jan 23 #28

Yep. Kingofalldems Jan 23 #10

Sanction that attorney. TheBlackAdder Jan 23 #36

Yes, but Trump will appeal. This could go all the way to SCOTUS. LeftInTX Jan 23 #11

Every now and then SCOTUS actually does the right thing. Frank D. Lincoln Jan 23 #18

I know what Clarence and Alito will do! LeftInTX Jan 23 #20

I sure hope you're right, LeftInTX. nt Frank D. Lincoln Jan 23 #25

Goodness we wouldn't have to worry about this Dem4life1234 Jan 23 #54

So if orangeanus succeeds would they take away citizenship from said persons??? sdfernando Jan 23 #64

Of course Trump will appeal. ShazzieB Jan 23 #40

The SCOTUS will NOT back Trump on this. Wiz Imp Jan 23 #49

Without corrupt lawyers, they'd be no Trump. C_U_L8R Jan 23 #12

All federal judges should be objecting to this awful E.O. regardless of politics FakeNoose Jan 23 #13

I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that is a constitutional order," Ray Bruns Jan 23 #15

Excellent, and I really like "Donvict"! pandr32 Jan 23 #16

Stole it from another DUer malaise Jan 23 #48

It deserves use! pandr32 Jan 23 #56

Wow! Thanks for posting this. nt spooky3 Jan 23 #17

YW! malaise Jan 23 #32

Meirda47 administration's attorney will be fired for not making a strong enough argument ... aggiesal Jan 23 #19

Dear Judge, meet 'President' Blatantly Unconstitutional. spanone Jan 23 #21

Trump's order was made knowing that it would be blocked by the courts. totodeinhere Jan 23 #22

Everyone here understands this is going to SCOTUS. Spare us the condescension. SunSeeker Jan 23 #26

I dare the SC judge who adopted two children from Ireland to declare birthright citizenship malaise Jan 23 #33

I don't think that even this SCOTUS will find that order constitutional. totodeinhere Jan 23 #58

it's also theater for the sick cult Skittles Jan 23 #76

Yes. And many members of his cult are so stupid that they totodeinhere Jan 24 #80

Department of Justice *GAG* Usually, I have an impulse of respect when I think of the Department of Justice - not now. NBachers Jan 23 #24

We are all cilla4progress Jan 23 #27

Way to go, U.S. District Court Judge John Coughenour! Well done, and quickly too. nt CaliforniaPeggy Jan 23 #30

id like to see the lawyers arguing for the order disbarred moonshinegnomie Jan 23 #31

THIS malaise Jan 23 #34

KICK Hekate Jan 23 #35

He attacked the judge malaise Jan 23 #39

The bill that has been proposed VMA131Marine Jan 23 #37

Not entirely true FBaggins Jan 23 #52

Thank you malaise Jan 23 #59

Well, except ... VMA131Marine Jan 23 #60

Not really - he was born almost a decade before the Chinese Exclusion Act FBaggins Jan 23 #68

Sigh ... VMA131Marine Jan 23 #69

Diplomatic Corp DallasNE Jan 24 #79

That's why I said the exceptions to "under the jurisdiction" VMA131Marine Jan 24 #81

Seriously? Courts have to duke out the jurisdiction of "All persons born..."? ancianita Jan 23 #74

Post removed Post removed Jan 23 #75

Bravo, Judge Coughenour 👍! Daleuhlmann Jan 23 #38

Tell Donvict malaise Jan 23 #41

Well, the donald might not care. calimary Jan 23 #63

Damn, someone still believes in the constitution. republianmushroom Jan 23 #42

Are you watching his lying press conference right now malaise Jan 23 #43

No, don't watch the news on TV. republianmushroom Jan 23 #45

He's a sick POS criminal who isn't fit for the presidency Dem4life1234 Jan 23 #55

Who, the judge ? republianmushroom Jan 23 #62

No trump I meant Dem4life1234 Jan 23 #70

Who are you talking about ? republianmushroom Jan 23 #65

The orange one Dem4life1234 Jan 23 #71

HOWEVER! 3825-87867 Jan 23 #44

It is unconstitutional William769 Jan 23 #50

I agree malaise Jan 23 #53

I pray Dem4life1234 Jan 23 #51

However, while this is (entirely ridiculously) a subject of litigation AZJonnie Jan 23 #57

Coming to America pregnant, then returning to Russia with new baby and American birth certificate. sueroseus Jan 23 #66

Personally I don't need to google because I remember reading the story quite well AZJonnie Jan 23 #67

Good! Now I won't be deported because my maternal ancestors came here before the USA ever existed. Jacson6 Jan 23 #61

That thing infesting the Oval Office is glaringly, blatantly unconstitutional. Six117 Jan 23 #72

John Coughenour was a Reagan appointment as well. Mountainguy Jan 23 #73

As expected by everyone, even the Trump administration. All a set up to get it to the SCOTUS. nt kelly1mm Jan 23 #77