Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

dalton99a

(85,246 posts)
Fri Jan 17, 2025, 10:40 AM 13 hrs ago

Biden says Equal Rights Amendment is ratified, kicking off expected legal battle [View all]

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/17/politics/joe-biden-equal-right-amendment/index.html

Biden says Equal Rights Amendment is ratified, kicking off expected legal battle as he pushes through final executive actions
By Betsy Klein and Arlette Saenz, CNN
Updated 10:01 AM EST, Fri January 17, 2025

President Joe Biden announced a major opinion Friday that the Equal Rights Amendment is ratified, enshrining its protections into the Constitution, a last-minute move that some believe could pave the way to bolstering reproductive rights.

It will, however, certainly draw swift legal challenges – and its next steps remain extremely unclear as Biden prepares to leave office.

The amendment, which was passed by Congress in 1972, enshrines equal rights for women. An amendment to the Constitution requires three-quarters of states, or 38, to ratify it. Virginia in 2020 became the 38th state to ratify the bill after it sat stagnant for decades. Biden is now issuing his opinion that the amendment is ratified, directing the archivist of the United States, Dr. Colleen Shogan, to certify and publish the amendment.

“It is long past time to recognize the will of the American people. In keeping with my oath and duty to Constitution and country, I affirm what I believe and what three-fourths of the states have ratified: The 28th Amendment is the law of the land, guaranteeing all Americans equal rights and protections under the law regardless of their sex,” Biden said in a statement Friday.

...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2025/01/17/statement-from-president-joe-biden-on-the-equal-rights-amendment/

Statement from President Joe Biden on the Equal Rights Amendment

I have supported the Equal Rights Amendment for more than 50 years, and I have long been clear that no one should be discriminated against based on their sex. We, as a nation, must affirm and protect women’s full equality once and for all.

On January 27, 2020, the Commonwealth of Virginia became the 38th state to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment. The American Bar Association (ABA) has recognized that the Equal Rights Amendment has cleared all necessary hurdles to be formally added to the Constitution as the 28th Amendment. I agree with the ABA and with leading legal constitutional scholars that the Equal Rights Amendment has become part of our Constitution.

It is long past time to recognize the will of the American people. In keeping with my oath and duty to Constitution and country, I affirm what I believe and what three-fourths of the states have ratified: the 28th Amendment is the law of the land, guaranteeing all Americans equal rights and protections under the law regardless of their sex.


103 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Surely now, it can no longer be a crime to treat dying women. Irish_Dem 13 hrs ago #1
Any challenges with be Trump's SCOTUS and Trump's DOJ and he'll own it if the ERA is overturned. TheBlackAdder 49 min ago #96
Why did he wait 4 years? MichMan 13 hrs ago #2
He doesn't want to deal with ramifications while he's presidenting. LeftInTX 13 hrs ago #7
So, instead of it being defended by his own DOJ, he left it up to the Trump DOJ. n/t MichMan 13 hrs ago #9
It seems that way. Seems like a Hail Mary move. LeftInTX 13 hrs ago #11
I agree we should never underestimate Joe. I'm sure he thought it through. Walleye 12 hrs ago #32
Agreed. InAbLuEsTaTe 38 min ago #101
And when that happens, will you criticize Trump as much as you have Biden? W_HAMILTON 12 hrs ago #31
Damn good question, damn good comments. Thanks. (nt) Paladin 11 hrs ago #49
Yes...that's the EXACT reason Roy Rolling 46 min ago #97
Some State? I would put my money on Texas - Paxton has no shame. walkingman 12 hrs ago #28
Of course he will. Another state could beat him too. LeftInTX 12 hrs ago #30
Unfortunately I think there's a lot of things that could be said about EdmondDantes_ 13 hrs ago #13
Thanks "performative" is the word. LeftInTX 13 hrs ago #14
Republicans are the performative clowns 🤡. live love laugh 12 hrs ago #23
I haven't seen anything that would convince me this isn't performative EdmondDantes_ 12 hrs ago #26
AND .... bothsiderism rears its ugly head .... live love laugh 12 hrs ago #27
By that logic here are some other bothsiderisms EdmondDantes_ 10 hrs ago #57
Why didn't he save the fucking world Monday morning QB? live love laugh 10 hrs ago #73
I look at it as a thorn in the side of the new administration Walleye 11 hrs ago #33
Oh, yes. ShazzieB 10 hrs ago #72
No, I think he's pitching a grenade. LisaM 10 hrs ago #64
Ask him. live love laugh 12 hrs ago #22
That's a good question, and there's no good answer msfiddlestix 8 hrs ago #78
What does it matter? Blue_Tires 7 hrs ago #81
So it would have already been in place the last 4 years ? MichMan 7 hrs ago #82
Then Trumpers would have killed it four years ago Blue_Tires 7 hrs ago #85
Because it ForgedCrank 5 hrs ago #87
With that and four dollars, he'll be able to buy a cup of coffee in Wilmington next week. NT mahatmakanejeeves 13 hrs ago #3
Nice... Hugin 13 hrs ago #4
Statement of President Joe Biden on the Equal Rights Amendment LetMyPeopleVote 13 hrs ago #5
And that SickOfTheOnePct 11 hrs ago #39
Worse than nothing, I'd bet quite a bit this goes to SCOTUS and torched Amishman 10 hrs ago #65
So liberal bloggers and pundits have been demanding this Blue_Tires 7 hrs ago #84
Thank you President Biden Quiet Em 13 hrs ago #6
What happens if the Archivist doesn't publish it ? MichMan 13 hrs ago #8
Seriously? tritsofme 13 hrs ago #10
This doesn't appear to be an order to publish it DetroitLegalBeagle 13 hrs ago #17
He just directed her to publish it MichMan 13 hrs ago #20
What would Trump do? Fire her and appoint a replacement to publish it. /nt bucolic_frolic 12 hrs ago #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Ursus Arctos 11 hrs ago #41
The National Archives is an independent agency DetroitLegalBeagle 12 hrs ago #25
That's good to know Polybius 10 hrs ago #50
Who the hell put a time limit on passing this anyway? I just don't know. Walleye 11 hrs ago #34
Congress did DetroitLegalBeagle 11 hrs ago #36
Congress, when it was passed 50 years ago MichMan 11 hrs ago #37
I think the Founding Fathers should have set every proposed Amendment to 10-15 years Polybius 10 hrs ago #53
This will be interesting, it's not immediately clear this is anything other than Biden's opinion. tritsofme 13 hrs ago #12
It's not an EO? LeftInTX 13 hrs ago #15
Its not an EO DetroitLegalBeagle 13 hrs ago #16
Another one. Sheesh. It's an Amendment. AllyCat 5 hrs ago #86
Thank you, President Biden. pandr32 13 hrs ago #18
I don't see how it kicks off a legal battle FBaggins 13 hrs ago #19
Apparently the deadline for approval by the states was 1982(!), so this is all for show. TheRickles 12 hrs ago #24
I'm just wondering how this deadline got set? I'll check out the link. Walleye 11 hrs ago #35
Here's more info, from today's Boston Globe (behind a paywall) TheRickles 11 hrs ago #42
Not to mention the states that rescinded their ratifications SickOfTheOnePct 11 hrs ago #43
It's an interesting debate Polybius 10 hrs ago #56
An interesting debate to be sure SickOfTheOnePct 10 hrs ago #60
It might even be 9-0 or close to it Polybius 10 hrs ago #63
I imagine because it's not feasible to go find someone's ballot once it is submitted MichMan 10 hrs ago #66
Early voting is a whole new topic Polybius 10 hrs ago #67
Rescinding is not legal. valleyrogue 1 hr ago #89
We really don't know SickOfTheOnePct 1 hr ago #91
So if the Democrats win Congress in the midterms, could they retroactively change the deadline I wonder Walleye 10 hrs ago #55
Perhaps SickOfTheOnePct 10 hrs ago #68
You can change a deadline before it happens, but how do you change it after the date? Polybius 10 hrs ago #69
It's from the Associated Press, so maybe it's posted elsewhere without the Globe's paywall. TheRickles 11 hrs ago #44
There is nothing in the Constitution saying there can be a deadline for ratification Wiz Imp 11 hrs ago #48
If the deadline is unconstitutional, then the entire Amendment might be invalid Polybius 8 hrs ago #76
Some Very smart legal scholars disagree and think it should stand. Wiz Imp 8 hrs ago #79
I respect you tremendously, but we disagree on this Polybius 1 hr ago #88
There are strong legal arguments on the first two points. Wiz Imp 1 hr ago #90
Serious question SickOfTheOnePct 1 hr ago #95
No. But it is a valid opinion by the ABA. And this Supreme Court has already shown that they are more than willing Wiz Imp 43 min ago #98
Thanks for your response n/t SickOfTheOnePct 42 min ago #100
Wrong. valleyrogue 1 hr ago #94
I'm still curious SickOfTheOnePct 43 min ago #99
The "deadline" was always bullshit. valleyrogue 26 min ago #103
Thank you, Joe SheltieLover 12 hrs ago #29
The "Christian" Taliban will never let that stand. nt CousinIT 11 hrs ago #38
It's About Damn Time!!! Do it, Joe! calimary 11 hrs ago #40
I am so confused. This is the effing 11th Hour of Biden's administration, not TGIF... Hekate 11 hrs ago #45
It's a short amendment. Link below. mn9driver 11 hrs ago #46
Biden is a great guy, so he's allowed to be wrong sometimes Polybius 11 hrs ago #47
VP Harris also concurs that it is now the law of the land MichMan 10 hrs ago #54
Then she's wrong too, because at this moment, it isn't Polybius 10 hrs ago #59
Thanks, President Biden! 🫶 still-prayin4rain 10 hrs ago #51
It is about time. I hope it survives in court. Martin68 10 hrs ago #52
It's worth a shot HereForTheParty 10 hrs ago #58
Thank you, again, President Joe Biden! You are the best president of my lifetime. LaMouffette 10 hrs ago #61
I believe this is what I am MOST excited to hear about! AllyCat 10 hrs ago #62
What are the legal arguments that could be brought against it? LAS14 10 hrs ago #70
Two legal arguments SickOfTheOnePct 10 hrs ago #71
Huh. Maybe I should have asked what the legal arguments are FOR ratification... nt LAS14 9 hrs ago #74
None n/t Polybius 8 hrs ago #75
Baloney. valleyrogue 1 hr ago #92
We don't now that rescinding is illegal SickOfTheOnePct 1 hr ago #93
thre was a 7 year deadline for ratification - ending in the early 1980s rampartd 8 hrs ago #77
So Biden is just dumping a legal fuss into Trump's lap to show his misogyny. nt LAS14 7 hrs ago #80
I can't wait to hear the challenges. William769 7 hrs ago #83
this seems huge prodigitalson 35 min ago #102
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Biden says Equal Rights A...