Charges Merrick Garland delayed or dragged his feet on the investigation are proven false in the Smith report

[bigtree]

12. it's more valid than the lies spread that Garland was inactive or delayed something.

...find one thing that Garland delayed in the report.

You present such a simplistic and incomplete projection of the investigation and prosecution that it's meaningless in a discussion of facts.

That's what this is, a discussion of facts in the investigation, not a continuation of the speculation and outright bull that characterized the period when all of this was done confidentialy.

We should be done with these false projections which have no basis in fact.

If you have proof of what you allege you should post it. Without it, what you wrote is completely unbelieveable and easily refuted from the facts in the Smith report.

The report states clearly that the investigation DID begin shortly after he took office, in the Fall of 2021, so that assertion of yours has been proven untrue, in the report, and in reporting for years now.

You can't support that claim of yours from anything in the final report, and I'm guessing that's why you didn't provide any proof of your claims whatsoever.