Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(39,261 posts)
Fri Jan 24, 2025, 07:38 AM Friday

Confront all right wing opponents' lingo, pretexts, rhetoric -- A content strategy inspired by The Bulwark.

Last edited Fri Jan 24, 2025, 08:20 AM - Edit history (1)

Moving forward requires honesty, whole truth and nothing-but-the-truth language.

Assume that humans are equal, facts and opinions are not -- some facts & opinions are more relevant, workable, helpful, and responsible than others. Context is everything.

Republican Party lingo, pretexts, legalese and empty rhetoric will not be stopped through being labeled BS.

1.
Every day we must
a) really listen to their words (because those lead to, or follow from, what they do) and
b) relentlessly confront the whole Republican caucus every single time even one of them defend, excuse, and dodge Trump's BS, and
c) repeat-repeat-repeat to their whole caucus to choose:
do the right thing for the right reasons, or obey their master, a convicted felon.


Every day.

The Bulwark offers 10 counter-rhetoric answers as one of our 'ways' forward. This list underscores what Dems' do well in communications.

2.
But, imo, we can use this list (ideas that aren't new) to press for a unified party comms strategy to shut down Republicans' defense of the indefensible. Congressional and state caucuses need to
a) unite under a national list of counter-messaging,
b) get on the news,
c) use one or more of that messaging every night across cable news & in weekly press conferences to
d) review Republicans' political lingo that enabled political violence that week through the midterms;
e) get on the news again, win or lose, and
f) use the new Democratic content strategy that contrasts our reality with their destructions/empty promises/proven lies to show what viewers' future will look like.

(My only disagreement with The Bulwark is the writer's title. Republicans didn't "learn to excuse."
They have a history of obeying in advance when they just get The side eye or The call from Big Money or a cursing vigilante. My title: Republican Talk Enables Political Violence )


How Republicans Learned to Excuse Political Violence

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/how-republicans-learned-to-excuse-political-violence-trump-january-6th-pardons


1. I support whatever Trump does.

“It’s the president’s sole decision,” Johnson declared on Tuesday. “And he made a decision, so I stand with him on it.”

That’s the authoritarian spirit. No matter what the leader does, his allies fall in line.

2. The pardons show Trump is a man of his word.

“He talked about that during the campaign,” Steve Scalise, the House majority leader, told reporters when they asked about Trump’s pardons for people who assaulted police. “President Trump is a man of his word. He’s going to follow through on his commitments.”

This, too, is the language of autocracy. The moral content of the leader’s threat or act is irrelevant. What matters is that he deserves praise for following through on his threats.

3. This is what the people voted for.

In a CNN interview on Wednesday, Senator Markwayne Mullin noted that during the 2024 campaign, Trump “did not hide that he was going to pardon January 6th individuals.” By electing Trump, Mullin argued, Americans gave Trump a mandate to do just that: “The American people [on] November 5th chose to move on past January 6th.”

This is the easiest way to unravel a constitutional democracy: You turn democracy against the constitution, by claiming that an election gave the winner a mandate to suspend or ignore laws. In reality, Americans gave Trump no such mandate. Multiple polls have found that they oppose pardons for people convicted of violent crimes on January 6th.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ancianita

(39,261 posts)
2. Excellent! In keeping with Hakeem Jeffries united House message about doing what benefits Working Class Americans.
Fri Jan 24, 2025, 08:08 AM
Friday

senseandsensibility

(20,624 posts)
3. Great suggestion
Sat Jan 25, 2025, 08:28 PM
Saturday

"How does this help hard working American families?" should be asked after every insane proposal and maybe show that it doesn't with a simple sentence or two.

msfiddlestix

(7,961 posts)
5. True, if the message rings true, which it does to me, does it even matter? After all, it worked for them for a long
Sun Jan 26, 2025, 03:41 PM
Sunday

time. Don't we wish our opponents were merely "conservative".
if wishes were Fishes and all that.
The situation we're dealing with is on the one hand extremely surreal, and on the other hand, a replica of human history. Speaking for myself, I never imagined the Republican party would go nearly this far as to resemble Hitler and other despots in history.

LAS14

(14,904 posts)
6. That's a recipe for diluting our message to water. Focus on what...
Sun Jan 26, 2025, 03:43 PM
Sunday

... the people voted him in for. Rent, gas and groceries. Don't let him distract with shock tactics.

ancianita

(39,261 posts)
7. Not so. Those were distractions to get the vote. We need to Focus on
Sun Jan 26, 2025, 06:24 PM
Sunday
what's behind his simple lies to Americans. His proudly proclaimed "weave" talk is still full of signals of political violence and ending freedom once and for all. So we'll have to help each other sort signal-to-noise better.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=19949314


erronis passes along good tips from historical resisters:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219948876

on executive orders that cover for unlawful dictatorial actions:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219948974#post8

In other words we have to focus on the distractor's signals, not his distracting noise -- or what he proudly calls his "weave."
Latest Discussions»The Way Forward»Confront all right wing o...