A surprising ‘yes’ vote from DiFi on medical marijuana use

[CountAllVotes]

The Senate Appropriations Committee did something last week the Senate has never done — it passed a marijuana reform measure. It was the narrowest of proposals, an amendment co-authored by Sens. Steve Daines, R-Mont., and Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., to a military spending bill that would prohibit the Department of Veterans Affairs from using federal money to prosecute doctors who recommend medical marijuana to veterans in states where the drug is legal.

Last year, the House passed five measures that supported states’ rights on marijuana. But the Senate would not budge — until Thursday. Twelve Democrats and four Republicans supported the amendment. Most amazing of all was a “yes” vote from Sen. Dianne Feinstein. “We’ve always had Dianne Feinstein down as a ‘no’ vote,” policy maven Michael Collins of the anti-drug-war Drug Policy Alliance told me. The California Democrat has been a staunch hawk in the war on drugs. She has described marijuana as a gateway drug. She would have been the only Democrat to vote “no.” But DiFi voted “yes,” although, Collins noted, her “‘yes’ was the most muffled yes I’ve ever heard in my life.”

A like-minded House amendment failed less than a month ago in a 213-210 vote, but if the Senate amendment passes, it could survive a joint conference committee. Tom Angell of Marijuana Majority observed, “Elected officials are finally starting to wake up to the fact that endorsing marijuana reform is good politics instead of the dangerous third-rail they’ve long viewed it as, and that means a lot more victories are on the way soon.”

Collins believes the landscape changed in March, when Sens. Cory Booker, D-N.J., Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., and Rand Paul, R-Ky., introduced the Carers (Compassionate Access, Research Expansion, and Respect States) Act. The measure would bar the Department of Justice from using federal dollars to prosecute medical-marijuana dispensaries in states where they are legal and reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I to Schedule II drug to allow for more medical research of cannabis. Feinstein has yet to reveal how she will vote on this bill.

More here: http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/saunders/article/A-surprising-yes-vote-from-DiFi-on-medical-6283562.php

Hell hath frozen over I do believe!!!

[antiquie]

1. Yes, indeed.

[olddots]

2. the materialistic pigs are about to sniff money to be made

DIfi or as I call her " Spooly Lady " along with people like her have no moral compass unless they don't see profits to be made .

[libdem4life]

3. If anything would raise the ire of California, even for DiFi, it would have been turning down this

issue. That being said, she and her husband Blum, and as a real estate developer, he'll know where there are fields to market the gold. They have more money than god, so you can bet he's poised to make yet another fortune.