History of Feminism
Related: About this forumWomen Read Playboy For The First Time The Huffington Post (NSFW)
Sorry-- this just cracked me up-I've hidden a couple of threads about SI swimsuit issue, but then I ran into this. While this is not an in depth analysis of course, it's a pretty funny take on looking at a magazine that objectifies women. (Yes the women volunteer To be in the photos, but women can't "choose" to be objectified, we are born objectified)
BuzzFeed asked 10 women who had never read Playboy to read the magazine and give some feedback. The reactions ranged from hilarious to confused as the women flipped through Playboy issues from the 1960s through 2015.
The women made some interesting discoveries. They found that a full bush was definitely big in the 80s, and that when it comes to models, Playboy has a serious lack of diversity. Apparently, the mag hasn't quite figured out its image yet, since the content ranges from "porno mag" to Vanity Fair-esque, as one woman put it.
While the magazine has attempted to rebrand its image of late by discussing real issues such as feminism and rape culture, these ladies probably won't be subscribing any time soon. One woman joked about Playboy's readership: They have the young men who really just want to look at the pictures, then theres the like Im a little bit more sophisticated man Im going to read the articles now. Then theres Im old, I have to read the articles so that I dont come off as a pervert."
BainsBane
(54,696 posts)(from what I have seen) is that they don't like real breasts. Real small breasts, too small. Real large breasts, not perky enough. Only aerodynamic, surgically implanted globes allowed.
I'm not playing that bait the feminists with SI game this year. I think we know those people will never enter the modern world. No amount of arguing will change that. I was a bit tempted by the OP equating that crap with art, but I trashed it instead.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)What fun is a trolling post if the trollees don't participate?
ismnotwasm
(42,436 posts)Discussion is one thing disingenuous crap is something else entirely
BainsBane
(54,696 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 6, 2015, 09:23 PM - Edit history (1)
That didn't hook any feminists. Those are pretty funny because you can see how badly they are itching for a fight. When they don't get it, they have to settle for their field of straw.
I like that image
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Takes all the fun away from the trollers.
ismnotwasm
(42,436 posts)I think the usual suspects are bored-- no one left to play with
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I did one reply in the current SI thread to one of the idiots who defended the existence of the "how young is too young" thread last year.
But you guys are right... it's just bait put out by half-witted piglets, and I think my practice will be to ignore and trash them from now on.
BainsBane
(54,696 posts)You make a cutting remark and remain calm the whole time. You definitely handle it better than I do.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Still... trashing those threads and avoiding the half-witted replies may help me think better of humans. A crisis of faith I'm dealing with as I get older.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)pretty damn quick in GD!
Phentex
(16,474 posts)I think they actually enjoy the baiting.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Response to ismnotwasm (Original post)
BlueJazz This message was self-deleted by its author.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)BainsBane
(54,696 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)Thank you. At least a few people won't think I'm a total jerk !
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)THAT is the discussion and what is talked about in here.
the societal acceptance of putting women in their place. and the reinforcement from those that run the show.
'nough said.