Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Showed up as one of DU's google ads (Original Post) Orrex Jun 2014 OP
At least it doesn't say BainsBane Jun 2014 #1
I think it's the "jail bait" gimmick that troubles me Orrex Jun 2014 #2
I missed that BainsBane Jun 2014 #5
Am I reading it right ... ? Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #3
Yeah, that's how I read it. Orrex Jun 2014 #4
What I think is it's partially true ismnotwasm Jun 2014 #6
That's a good assessment, I think Orrex Jun 2014 #7
It's awful. redqueen Jun 2014 #8

BainsBane

(54,728 posts)
1. At least it doesn't say
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 09:02 AM
Jun 2014

C...

Doesn't bother me, certainly not compared to other stuff being posted by some active members.

Orrex

(64,059 posts)
2. I think it's the "jail bait" gimmick that troubles me
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 09:20 AM
Jun 2014

As you say, not as bad as other stuff, but not ideal either.

Orrex

(64,059 posts)
4. Yeah, that's how I read it.
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 09:50 AM
Jun 2014

Unless she's inviting the viewer to particpate in a clever money laundering scheme, one wonders what we are to infer from the shirt's subtle message...

ismnotwasm

(42,443 posts)
6. What I think is it's partially true
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 01:03 PM
Jun 2014

Oh men don't want to go to jail, but a glance at popular porn includes terms that are very frequent like "underage" or "teenage sluts". They don't want to get caught, but they the ones who want young, want young.

So it's marketing a sense of sexual power to young girls. As far as DU, the people who own it say they have no control over content. Since there are very few teenagers on this site it's pretty weird.

Orrex

(64,059 posts)
7. That's a good assessment, I think
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 01:11 PM
Jun 2014

I don't fault DU for the ads, because I know that they're generated by some arcane google algorithm, but it's an odd juxtaposition. I suspect that google latched onto the recent "stuck in the sculpture" thread, and maybe the Rude Pundit's threads as well.

I spotted the ad on my computer at work, and it's not as though I'm committing any naughtiness on this system...

redqueen

(115,164 posts)
8. It's awful.
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 02:44 PM
Jun 2014

And it reminds me of this tumblr post:

darkmarxsoul:

iflybikes:

When men talk of women and girls in terms of legal/not legal, what they’re really saying is “I already sexually objectify this child and would attempt to fuck her if there were no laws in the way.”

You can’t deny that is fucking scary.

Sometimes there are things that just sort of vaguely seem wrong, but you can’t put your finger on why…until it’s worded like this, and suddenly everything slides into place and you feel like someone punched you in the gut.


The normalization of the idea of adult men fetishizing young teens is not new. There's a song posted in ism's thread about misogynistic music that's about this, and it's from the 50's or 60's.

Now that porn is tainting so many other aspects of society it's getting more noticeable. Maybe enough people might start to notice it and decide it's a problem that it might actually change. That kind of thing is the goal of radical feminism, and it's why we complain about these kinda things.

And just thought I'd also mention, there are many who are busy pushing the idea that it's 'natural' for adult men to fetishize young teenage girls, e.g. making up reasons to rationalize it using bullshit like evo psych.
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Showed up as one of DU's ...