Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Related: About this forumWhy the Campus Rape Crisis Confounds Colleges
http://www.thenation.com/article/180114/why-campus-rape-crisis-confounds-colleges
The dean of student life acted as the investigator in the case. When Logan arrived at her office to give a statement, the deans recorder was broken. Instead, she took notes. Later, she produced a document that was missing important information.
In May 2011, there was a hearing with a panel made up of faculty and administrators. Logans alleged assailant appeared via Skype. One of the worst parts of the hearing was that each party was allowed to ask the other questions, and those questions would be reviewed or filtered through the hearing board, Logan says. So her alleged rapist would direct questions to her, and she would wait as the board decided whether they were relevant and she had to answer them. It was a really revictimizing experience, she says.
At one point, after a break, she returned to the room to hear the members of the panel chatting amiably with her accused attacker about his finals and the weather in the country where he was studying. How do you come into a room where everyone is laughing with your rapist? she says.
There was surprisingly little disagreement between the two about the facts of the case, only about what those facts meant. The young man argued that shed been extremely drunk during both encounters, Logan says, as if that somehow exonerated rather than indicted him. He was using the policy violation as an excuse for his policy violation.
In the end, he was found responsible and expelled. Then he appealed, arguing, in part, that since hed been drinking too, technically she was an assailant as well. Logan says that Occidentals lawyer began pressuring her to reach a private settlement with the mans family, but she refused and the appeal went forward. Again, the young man lost. He would be kept off campus for good. It was the fullest victory a victim can expect in a case like this, and yet Logan felt more devastated than vindicated. The adjudication board itself was one of the worst things I had to experience outside of the actual assault, and in some ways it was worse, she says.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1643 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why the Campus Rape Crisis Confounds Colleges (Original Post)
eridani
Jun 2014
OP
It's not about who was drinking. "Drunk" sex is sex, "drunk" rape is rape.
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#4
enough
(13,449 posts)1. k&r (nt)
phantom power
(25,966 posts)2. recommend
ismnotwasm
(42,443 posts)3. This is truly an excellent article
I'm booking marking it-- very informative
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)4. It's not about who was drinking. "Drunk" sex is sex, "drunk" rape is rape.
The consent ("yes means yes" or lack thereof ("no means no" is the crucial factor.
Dipshits.