History of Feminism
Related: About this forumJust sat on a jury. Juror 4 is a piece of work.
On Thu May 1, 2014, 11:47 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Maybe I used the wrong words. "I have a discussion with my wife about this topic.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4894362
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
So sick of this guy bashing nationalities. Everyday he's either trashing Americans or the Chinese. Bigotry is fucking bigotry and it makes DU suck.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu May 1, 2014, 12:03 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: DU needs two new forums.
She-Ra man hating forum no boys allowed!
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A fine whine ... What makes DU suck is people stifling discussion by taking offense so easily. How can one compare cultures without any criticism?
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: nanjing to seoul said/wrote nothing that can be construed covertly or overtly as bigotry. I don't understand the reason for this alert. Overly sensitive in my estimation.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
BainsBane
(54,728 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Boys are most definitely allowed. Skinner said we were to educate the boys. I see men on here all the time trying to help the boys grow into respectable, decent contributing members of society.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)It was a "Freudian Slip" of the tongue by NtS, I am sure. It was a good catch, not sure it should have been alerted but, am Glad that it was because it exposed Juror#4 whomever they may be.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)I think that's a thing. Even if the misogyny wasn't offensive, which it is, the innumeracy would be.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I'd get it to admin's attention anyway.
ismnotwasm
(42,443 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,443 posts)And body parts of course
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)It's about bigotry toward Americans and Chinese. So, juror #4 can't correctly read an alert. Perhaps their juror privileges should be revoked?