Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 06:45 PM Dec 2012

Occupy Cleveland arrests reversed, law found unConstitutional

BЯΞAKB∃∆Ƭ ‏@BreaKBeatJunkee

#OccupyCleveland arrests RT @TimRussoCLE @BreaKBeatJunkee arrests in 2011 ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL by OhioAppCt http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/8/2012/2012-ohio-5749.pdf … …



{¶1} For purposes of this opinion, the appeals of both appellants Erin
McCardle and Leatrice Tolls have been consolidated.1

{¶2} Appellants Erin McCardle and Leatrice Tolls appeal their
convictions for violating Cleveland Codified Ordinances 559.541 (“CCO
559.541”), which prohibits remaining, without a permit, between the hours of
10:00 p.m. and 5:00 a.m., on an area of downtown Cleveland, Ohio known as
Public Square, specifically, the Tom L. Johnson quadrant.2 They assign the
following error for our review:

I. Cleveland Cod. Ord. 559.541 is unconstitutional under
the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United
States Constitution.

{¶3} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we reverse and
remand the trial court’s decision. The apposite facts follow.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Occupy Cleveland arrests reversed, law found unConstitutional (Original Post) Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 OP
GREAT NEWS! CaliforniaPeggy Dec 2012 #1
Cool! n/t LeftofObama Dec 2012 #2
Slap! Downwinder Dec 2012 #3
Hot damn on a fire stick!!!! dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #4
That's all the information I have; logically, the city will appeal. Hopefully, they won't. n/t Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #5
The way that the decision is worded an appeal is doubtful. Downwinder Dec 2012 #6
Good. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #7

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
3. Slap!
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 07:07 PM
Dec 2012

Judgment reversed and remanded for further proceedings
consistent with this opinion.
It is, therefore, considered that said appellants recover of said appellee
their costs herein taxed.
It is ordered that a special mandate be sent to said court to carry this
judgment into execution.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,011 posts)
4. Hot damn on a fire stick!!!!
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 07:22 PM
Dec 2012

Nice to know SOME courts follow the Constitution.
Is the decision going to be appealed?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»Occupy Cleveland arrests ...