Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Okay, Natural Nancy, PhD....satire or not? (Original Post) Dr. Strange Oct 2015 OP
Clearly a spoof. bvf Oct 2015 #1
Here's her website. Dr. Strange Oct 2015 #2
Hmm... bvf Oct 2015 #3
Dihydrogen monoxide? Clearly a spoof. Warpy Oct 2015 #4
The dihydrogen monoxide thing is clearly a spoof... Silent3 Oct 2015 #6
Real or spoof, that picture is hilarious. progressoid Oct 2015 #8
Nutjob Nancy is pretty stupid. She's real. It's her PhD that's fake. Nailzberg Oct 2015 #5
She's real, but there is a spoof page, too. HuckleB Oct 2015 #7
 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
1. Clearly a spoof.
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 06:11 PM
Oct 2015

A take on the general ignorance of the average American consumer, and a demonstration of how easily it can be taken advantage of.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
3. Hmm...
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 07:19 PM
Oct 2015

I see your point.

Possibly silly question here from a non-Facebook user:

Could somebody have hacked her account?

 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
6. The dihydrogen monoxide thing is clearly a spoof...
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:53 AM
Oct 2015

...but many woos bought into it as if it were serious, and passed it on with serious concern.

A few woos have enough of a sense of humor about themselves (rare, I know) to have seen the DHMO thing as funny, and spread it around as a joke. Since Nancy's Facebook page also has this:



...she's probably in the latter category.

But a willingness to joke a bit aside, I'm pretty sure the rest of her Facebook page and her web site is meant seriously, the usual "natural = good, artificial = bad" woo, with the typical anecdote-based, personal-experience-based, cherry-picking of exaggerated interpretation of isolated studies-based recommendations that this food and that food amazingly accomplish this and that wonderful health goal.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Okay, Natural Nancy, PhD....