Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(162,344 posts)
Wed Dec 21, 2022, 03:21 AM Dec 2022

Confronting the Confounding Cosmic Mind of Homo Sapiens

Guy P. Harrison
About Thinking

Personal Perspective: Pondering our paradoxical brain.
Posted December 16, 2022 | Reviewed by Ekua Hagan

These are strange times for the supremely bright and most nonsensical lifeform on Earth. Even as our knowledge swells exponentially and we think our way deeper into the universe’s most challenging mysteries, we somehow balance all of it with stellar stupidity. Medical quackery sells as if that thing called science never happened. Conspiratorial craziness surfs a perfect wave called the internet. Millions hail imbeciles as political saviors and venerate deranged celebrities.

Objectivity is difficult at ground zero, but the human mind does seem to be accelerating on two diverging tracks. It’s as if a race between human genius and the village idiot has gone supersonic. Perhaps there can never be a winner because nature doomed us to be as senseless as we are smart. Or maybe we are only a few societal tweaks away from intellectual elevation. Who can say? For basic self-awareness, however, it is important that we at least acknowledge the opposing extremes to which our thoughts now carry us. Confronting this problem might even inspire, or shame, more of us to want to do better.

First, we must reject the common belief that our cognitive crisis is about dim people vs. bright people or the educated vs. the uneducated. If only it were that simple. To varying degrees, the problem is everywhere because all minds are prone to daily bouts of perfect clarity and self-inflicted folly. Misperceptions and muddled assumptions are standard features of the human condition. Even the best of us are clever and gullible throughout life, often from one moment to the next. We all believe silly things, what matters is how many and how silly.

Humankind is unique, the impossible species simultaneously worthy of awe, applause, tears, and ridicule. So aware and so lost, we are the bipedal paradox, the big-brained airheads. How can one lifeform be this empowered by intelligence and so crippled by self-inflicted folly? In our defense, we are not the first wave of high-functioning clowns. But how far back must one go to land on a time in which the hordes of humanity were not stumbling over their fantasies? All the way, probably. Maybe one of the first humans was also the last rational human. I can imagine such a person, living a million years or so ago in the form of Homo erectus. Perhaps she or he was too focused on perfecting an Acheulean handaxe and feeding a fragile fire to entertain a long list of confusions and delusions of the sort that cloud our minds today.

More:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/about-thinking/202212/confronting-the-confounding-cosmic-mind-of-homo-sapiens

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Haggard Celine

(17,017 posts)
1. The article says that we shouldn't believe that
Wed Dec 21, 2022, 05:01 AM
Dec 2022

this is all about smart people v. dim people, but I see certain trends that make me think there's a conflict on the horizon.

I see billionaires funding politicians who want to get rid of every social program. And I see the stores where I shop gradually doing away with cashiers. There's also increasing automation in all sorts of industries.

The proles are going to find themselves out of work, so what will they do? How will they get money to live on if we do away with social programs? I know they say this is paranoid thinking, but it seems to me that there is a culling on the way. How else will the wealthy and intelligent be able to survive when the population growth is out of control? They think that all of the poor are a dead weight on society that is dragging the human race down. They think that a culling is inevitable and desirable.



TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
2. Maybe, but I have been hearing these Malthusian arguments...
Wed Dec 21, 2022, 05:21 AM
Dec 2022

all my life. And all my life hsve deen the opposite happen. We even argued the point in college economic courses a lifetime ago.

Somehow, though, our instincts for survival, allng with some blind luck, has managed go get us through.

It will be interesting to see how we get through this one.

Haggard Celine

(17,017 posts)
3. It will definitely be interesting.
Wed Dec 21, 2022, 06:18 AM
Dec 2022

Looks like we're living at just the right time to have a ringside seat at a turning point for the world. I think it's going to be a horror show, but I'll be glad if I'm wrong.

Haggard Celine

(17,017 posts)
7. Yes, they need to do their share to care for their fellow humans.
Wed Dec 21, 2022, 06:42 AM
Dec 2022

Hoarding wealth while others starve is obscene. And if the billionaires sway the government to grant some of their antisocial initiatives, there will be massive unrest. But there might be plans to deal with that inevitability.

I think that a lot of people sense that something is coming, which is why Trump became popular for that large segment of the population. They don't know what it is, but they know in their unconscious minds that something isn't right in the world, and they're lashing out because they're scared as hell. They want someone who will change the course we're on right now, and they'll get behind whoever says that they can fix it all. They'll even get behind a wolf.

Bernardo de La Paz

(50,850 posts)
6. Societies that think together think better. I'm not talking group-think. Democracy is thinking
Wed Dec 21, 2022, 06:28 AM
Dec 2022

Democracy is thinking together. Full of debate and contention, but a well-functioning democracy unites after elections.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Anthropology»Confronting the Confoundi...