Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumCarrying on discussions about religion requires wit.
There is an established hierarchy of people's wit. From maximum to minimum, it goes:
Quick-wit
Halfwit
Dimwit
Nitwit
Lackwit
The parameters for each level are not precise. Thus it is unwise to apply those labels to others or to yourself in a public way.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1341 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Carrying on discussions about religion requires wit. (Original Post)
MineralMan
Mar 2019
OP
I looked up all five. They are all one word, except that quick-wit gets a dash.
marylandblue
Mar 2019
#6
The Velveteen Ocelot
(120,601 posts)1. Don't forget fuckwit, but that probably applies more to politics.
MineralMan
(147,445 posts)3. I think that is in a category of its own.
Besides, it uses a bad word, and my mother might read this, see...so don't fuckwit me....
Croney
(4,918 posts)2. I had to look up lack wit.
I found it to be one word, lackwit.
I was witless.
MineralMan
(147,445 posts)4. Hmph! I separated the words intentionally to
maintain uniformity.
Croney
(4,918 posts)5. I figured that out. As I said, I was witless.
I really hadn't heard the word before.
Hey wait a minute. Quickwit is not a word.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)6. I looked up all five. They are all one word, except that quick-wit gets a dash.
So keep your wits and correct your grammar.
MineralMan
(147,445 posts)7. Aha! I have edited the post accordingly.
Je vous remercie.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)8. Good job! You may advance yourself one wit.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)9. Wit is your point? eom