Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Automobile Enthusiasts
Related: About this forumA socialist writer skewered the Formula One scene. Then her article vanished.
A socialist writer skewered the Formula One scene. Then her article vanished.Editors for Road & Track arent saying why they yanked Kate Wagners story from the website shortly after it published
By Will Sommer
March 5, 2024 at 4:53 p.m. EST
Driver Max Verstappen, left, and Oracle Red Bull Racing Team principal Christian Horner celebrate their victory at the Grand Prix of Bahrain on Saturday. (Clive Rose/Getty Images)
Writer Kate Wagner may have seemed like an odd choice to cover the luxury world of Formula One. A socialist whos painfully self-conscious about class differences, Wagner skewers expensive homes on her blog McMansion Hell and writes about architecture for the left-wing magazine the Nation. Formula One races, meanwhile, have become pit stops on the jet-set circuit, where the cheapest general-admission tickets start around $500. Still, Road & Track magazine commissioned Wagner to cover a Formula One race in Austin last fall, sending her on a trip funded by British petrochemicals company INEOS.
Her resulting 5,000-word story has drawn praise since it was published Friday, largely because of the unlikely pairing of writer and subject. Even better than what youre imagining, the conservative website the Bulwark gushed. Former CNN host Brian Stelter heralded it as a joy to read.
While Wagner wrote appreciatively about the sports aesthetics and superstar driver Lewis Hamiltons aura, she also dissected the crowd of tech bros and Ozempic-riddled influencers that surrounds the sport. People clinked glasses of free champagne in outfits worth more than the market price of all the organs in my body, she wrote.
Anyone who wants to read it, though, wont be reading it on Road & Tracks website. Roughly an hour after it was published, Behind F1s Velvet Curtain vanished without an explanation. In its absence, admirers have resorted to sharing an archived version that seems to have gone viral in media circles many noting, as did New Yorker food writer Helen Rosner, that it had been mysteriously removed.
{snip}
By Will Sommer
Will Sommer is a media reporter for the Style section. He's the author of "Trust the Plan: The Rise of QAnon and the Conspiracy That Unhinged America," a book covering the QAnon movement. Twitter https://twitter.com/willsommer
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1646 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A socialist writer skewered the Formula One scene. Then her article vanished. (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2024
OP
House of Roberts
(5,668 posts)1. It took her four months to write it?
I'm a little confused.
Old Crank
(4,557 posts)3. I'm not sure where that number came from
but for print media, and this was published online, there is quite a lead time before articles get included in the magazine. Perhaps she was told to have the article done in 4 months.
Old Crank
(4,557 posts)2. Fun article.
I read it to my wife who thought it was funny. She doesn't follow racing at all.
Mr.Bill
(24,753 posts)4. I didn't read it, so I'm just speculating,
but is it possible that there was some sort of legal problem with the article? Someone threatening a lawsuit or something?