Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProfessorGAC

(69,742 posts)
Sun Jan 23, 2022, 08:12 AM Jan 2022

So, Who Had The Under?

I'm really surprised at the total for yesterday's games.
Two games, 58 points! That's 10 points under the league average FOR ALL FOUR TEAMS!
If somebody saw this coming, I'm impressed!
I thought the Titans/Bengals game might be a shootout. So, much for that!

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, Who Had The Under? (Original Post) ProfessorGAC Jan 2022 OP
The Titans should have shut Henry down exboyfil Jan 2022 #1
On the 4th down run the defense was on him in the backfield, not much could be done. dem4decades Jan 2022 #2
They were not bad runs, they were bad play calls. Ferrets are Cool Jan 2022 #3
So much for the bye week underpants Jan 2022 #4
Well, the weather was crap in Green Bay ... Auggie Jan 2022 #5
I Get You, But... ProfessorGAC Jan 2022 #6
One explanation for Rodgers play from the San Francisco Chronicle: Auggie Jan 2022 #7

exboyfil

(17,986 posts)
1. The Titans should have shut Henry down
Sun Jan 23, 2022, 08:19 AM
Jan 2022

And continued to go with Foreman he had more yards as Henry with 4 carries vs. 20. He has been doing well while Henry is out. Henry will get back, but the 4th down run and the 2 pt conversion run showed that he isn't there yet.

underpants

(186,472 posts)
4. So much for the bye week
Sun Jan 23, 2022, 09:32 AM
Jan 2022

The teams that stayed in their groove won last night. That Mitchell guy from SF - man he was fun to watch. At full strength and in playing mode Henry is a beast but Tennessee changed up what was working for them and it cost them. Three interceptions didn’t help either.

Auggie

(31,775 posts)
5. Well, the weather was crap in Green Bay ...
Sun Jan 23, 2022, 11:57 AM
Jan 2022

and these are higher-seeded, playoff-quality defenses.

I took the 49ers to cover. Never expected them to win. Spread favored the Packers by six -- a lot to give IMO.

I thought Tennessee would roll over Cincy. WRONG!

ProfessorGAC

(69,742 posts)
6. I Get You, But...
Sun Jan 23, 2022, 12:10 PM
Jan 2022

...both teams have played in bad weather before. Geez, Garapolo grew up in the Chicago suburbs, went to college in Illinois, and played in Boston for 5 years. He knows what winter is.
It was cold, and there was some wind, but it wasn't a hurricane. I'm still surprised the score was that low.
As to the defenses, there's no argument, but none of these teams are the '85 Bears or 2012 Ravens Good defenses, sure. Great defenses? I don't think so.

Auggie

(31,775 posts)
7. One explanation for Rodgers play from the San Francisco Chronicle:
Sun Jan 23, 2022, 05:27 PM
Jan 2022

“We were disguising (coverages) really well,” said 49ers free safety Jimmie Ward. “And we confused him (Rodgers).”

SNIP

Rodgers, 38, is a 17-year veteran who was making is 228th career start. Did the 49es really flummox him?

“I think the only way you can know for sure is to ask Aaron,” (49ers linebacker) Warner said.

“They did a good job of kind of getting me off the spot and a better job of taking away some of the quick game that we got going the last time we played them,” Rodgers said. “… They had a good plan, for sure. It was more of the pass rush. The pass rush was formidable.”

paywall at the link: https://www.sfchronicle.com/sports/49ers/article/We-find-a-way-How-the-49ers-beat-the-16797484.php

As for the 49ers, I think the Packers effectively shut down the 49ers running game, forcing Garoppola, with injured hand and shoulder, to throw. It worked.

Good games plans limited both offenses.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»So, Who Had The Under?