Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Women's World
Related: About this forumAm I the only one whose eyes notice only 4 women at the NATO meeting?
I am a very visual person and whenever I see a photo of leaders (political, financial, spiritual) I always notice how obvious the lack of women is. I always wonder if an alien came to Earth and saw these groups they would think that 90% of Earthlings are white men. And this is 2022. One step forward, one step back?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 3706 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Am I the only one whose eyes notice only 4 women at the NATO meeting? (Original Post)
BigmanPigman
Mar 2022
OP
DURHAM D
(32,834 posts)1. Nope
I noticed. PISSES ME OFF
Ocelot II
(120,393 posts)2. Iceland, Denmark, Estonia and Lithuania.
Until recently, Germany (Merkel) and Norway (Solberg).
BigmanPigman
(52,208 posts)3. Wow, we've come a long way, baby....
I am 59 years old and I have realized that the more things change the more they stay the same. Very depressing.
Ocelot II
(120,393 posts)4. Yup. It's pretty discouraging.
Walleye
(35,095 posts)5. I noticed. There was a time not too long ago there would've been any
But its a piss poor representation
WhiteTara
(30,139 posts)6. Dadgum! 4 women? That's an improvement
from the past.
BigmanPigman
(52,208 posts)7. And 27 men!
WhiteTara
(30,139 posts)8. I forgot my sarcasm thingy
but still not long ago there would have been no women at the table.
BigmanPigman
(52,208 posts)9. We need a majority of women for the next 3,000 years
just to see if they would fuck up the world as much as the men have done.