I was a liberal mole at Fox News: From Bill O’Reilly to Roger Ailes, here’s all the inside dope

[Tx4obama]

I was a liberal mole at Fox News: From Bill O’Reilly to Roger Ailes, here’s all the inside dope
Inside the beast: O'Reilly hates Hannity. Producers know what's acceptable. Everyone fears a call from Roger Ailes
By Joe Muto
Excerpted from "An Atheist in the FOXhole: A Liberal's Eight-Year Odyssey Inside the Heart of the Right-Wing Media"


People would often ask me about how Fox pushes a message.

And I would always tell them the message isn’t so much pushed as it is pulled, gravitationally, with Roger Ailes as the sun at the center of the solar system; his vice presidents were the forces of gravity that kept the planet-size anchors and executive producers in a tight orbit; then all the lesser producers and PAs were moons and satellites and debris of varying sizes.

An organizational flow chart at Fox would be tough to draw up, as title alone was not the ultimate signifier of status. Sometimes the anchors outranked their executive producers, as was the case with “The O’Reilly Factor.” (In fact, Bill had procured an EP title for himself, but he outranked the two other EPs on the show, both Stan, who oversaw TV, radio, and the website, and Gayle, who focused on television and also served as a fact-checker.) Sometimes the anchors were relatively weak — as was the case with a lot of weekend shows, and maybe some of the newswheel hours — and a strong senior producer or producer outranked, or at least pretended to outrank, the host. (For example, Lizzie from “The Lineup,” who was only a producer but was tough enough that she probably could have bossed around Ailes himself had she been left alone in a room with him for more than five minutes.)

The bottom line is that each show had one person — be they anchor or producer or whoever — who was directly accountable to the Second Floor. That was the brilliance of the company’s power structure. One misconception that outsiders always had about the channel is that we’d sit around all morning planning how to distort the news that day. But there was never any centralized control like that. No “marching orders,” as it were. Instead, it was more a decentralized, entrepreneurial approach. Each show was an autonomous unit. Each showrunner — who had not risen to their position by being stupid — knew exactly what was expected of them, knew what topics and guests would be acceptable.

-snip-

Full post here: http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/i_was_a_liberal_mole_at_fox_news_from_bill_oreilly_to_roger_ailes_heres_all_the_inside_dope/

[Tx4obama]

1. Who is Muto? See excerpt below

-snip-

So this guy, Joe Muto, worked for the Fox News organization, specifically with Bill O'Reilly, for about eight years.

Now he has now written a book about his experiences called "An Atheist in a Foxhole."

A portion of which has been reprinted with permission by Salon.

-snip-

http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2013/05/liberal-mole-embeds-himself-within-fox.html

[Scuba]

2. So, part of Gayle's job was to make sure no facts slipped in? Not surprised each show had ...

... what the old Soviet military called a "political officer".

[Laelth]

3. Interesting. k&r for exposure. n/t

-Laelth