Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumGorsuch, joined by Sotomayor(!), writes that SCOTUS should've taken a Confrontation Clause case
Last edited Mon Nov 19, 2018, 11:24 AM - Edit history (1)
WhatCouldGoWrongHat RetweetedGorsuch, joined by Sotomayor(!), writes that SCOTUS shouldve taken a Confrontation Clause case and affirmed defendants right to cross-examine forensic analysts at trial. (I think hes absolutely correct.) https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/111918zor_q86b.pdf
Link to tweet
Scalia was the courts Confrontation Clause champion, and it appears Gorsuch is eager to continue his legacy. Good for him.
Link to tweet
SCOTUSblog Retweeted
#SCOTUS denies review in Stuart v Alabama, involving introduction of blood-alcohol testing w/out testimony from analyst who performed test. Gorsuch dissented from denial, joined by Sotomayor.
Link to tweet
The running tally is:
DUers, opposed to cross-examination (Betsy DeVos wants to let accused sex abusers cross examine their victims);
Gorsuch, in favor of cross-examination.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1913 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gorsuch, joined by Sotomayor(!), writes that SCOTUS should've taken a Confrontation Clause case (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2018
OP
hlthe2b
(106,246 posts)1. Like a lot of CO conservatives, Gorsuch has strong Libertarian underpinnings...
Unfortunately, his Corporatist ties are equally strong, so we can expect a lot of seeming paradoxical votes from him, I think.
qazplm135
(7,487 posts)2. The only thing Scalia was good on was 4th amendment stuff
Gorsuch is a mini-Scalia so makes sense.
mahatmakanejeeves
(60,789 posts)3. Scalia was a junkyard dog on 1A.
Texas v. Johnson
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states. Justice William Brennan wrote for a five-justice majority in holding that the defendant Gregory Lee Johnson's act of flag burning was protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Johnson was represented by attorneys David D. Cole and William Kunstler.
....
The Supreme Court's decision
The opinion of the Court came down as a controversial 54 decision, with the majority opinion delivered by William J. Brennan, Jr. and Justices Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, Antonin Scalia, and Anthony Kennedy joining Brennan, with Kennedy also writing a concurrence.
....
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states. Justice William Brennan wrote for a five-justice majority in holding that the defendant Gregory Lee Johnson's act of flag burning was protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Johnson was represented by attorneys David D. Cole and William Kunstler.
....
The Supreme Court's decision
The opinion of the Court came down as a controversial 54 decision, with the majority opinion delivered by William J. Brennan, Jr. and Justices Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, Antonin Scalia, and Anthony Kennedy joining Brennan, with Kennedy also writing a concurrence.
....