Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Civil Liberties

mahatmakanejeeves

(60,789 posts) Sat Sep 29, 2018, 03:27 PM Sep 2018

"Not in this America, you pharisaical theocratic half-wit."

Not in this America, you pharisaical theocratic half-wit.

Link to tweet

It would be permissible to charge this man under our Constitution. It protects POLITICAL speech, not pornography, profanity, or blasphemy. Whether we choose to or not is a separate question. http://www.foxnews.com/world/2018/09/29/film-director-to-be-prosecuted-for-allegedly-insulting-god-virgin-mary-in-facebook-post.html … #FoxNews

Link to tweet

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Not in this America, you pharisaical theocratic half-wit." (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2018 OP

What a freaking moron this Bryan Fischer is ... FFS ... mr_lebowski Sep 2018 #1

Does he think Duncan Hunter could be prosecuted for blasphemy against Islam? Shrike47 Sep 2018 #2

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)

1. What a freaking moron this Bryan Fischer is ... FFS ...

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Sat Sep 29, 2018, 03:38 PM

Sep 2018

Remind me, where the words 'political speech', or the word 'blasphemy' appearing as specific 'stipulations' in our First Amendment?

What's that?

They're not there?

That's what I thought.

Probably best that you STFU, BRYAN.

dipshit

Shrike47

(6,913 posts)

2. Does he think Duncan Hunter could be prosecuted for blasphemy against Islam?

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Sat Sep 29, 2018, 04:02 PM

Sep 2018

Reply to this discussion